Publication

Genoegen nemen met minder: Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie?

Padmos, L. & Dijkstra, J., 1-Sep-2019, In : Mens en Maatschappij. 94, 3, p. 275-302 28 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Padmos, L., & Dijkstra, J. (2019). Genoegen nemen met minder: Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie? Mens en Maatschappij, 94(3), 275-302. https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2019.3.002.PADM

Author

Padmos, Lars ; Dijkstra, Jacob. / Genoegen nemen met minder : Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie?. In: Mens en Maatschappij. 2019 ; Vol. 94, No. 3. pp. 275-302.

Harvard

Padmos, L & Dijkstra, J 2019, 'Genoegen nemen met minder: Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie?', Mens en Maatschappij, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 275-302. https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2019.3.002.PADM

Standard

Genoegen nemen met minder : Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie? / Padmos, Lars; Dijkstra, Jacob.

In: Mens en Maatschappij, Vol. 94, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 275-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Padmos L, Dijkstra J. Genoegen nemen met minder: Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie? Mens en Maatschappij. 2019 Sep 1;94(3):275-302. https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2019.3.002.PADM


BibTeX

@article{3ae9931ae728435aa0cb51c4f80fc0e7,
title = "Genoegen nemen met minder: Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie?",
abstract = "In a well-functioning democracy voters should elect parties and representatives with whom they agree on policy issues. The current paper investigates the extent to which Dutch voters in the 2017 parliamentary election had accurate information about parties’ policy positions. We elicit the extent to which voters think they vote for parties with whom they maximally agree (subjective congruence) and the extent to which this is actually true (objective congruence). Results show voters in our sample to have accurate information about approximately half of the policy positions of a random large party. Only 21.5 percent voted for a party with whom they were maximally objectively congruent. Objective congruence does not increase with information accuracy. Voters appear to consciously accept losses in terms of subjective congruence, as only 34.7 percent votes for a party with whom they think to be maximally congruent. These results are compatible with the interpretation of voters first choosing a party, and then (to some degree) adapting their personal policy positions to those of the chosen party.",
author = "Lars Padmos and Jacob Dijkstra",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5117/MEM2019.3.002.PADM",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "94",
pages = "275--302",
journal = "Mens en Maatschappij",
issn = "0025-9454",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genoegen nemen met minder

T2 - Een bewuste politieke keuze of een gebrek aan informatie?

AU - Padmos, Lars

AU - Dijkstra, Jacob

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - In a well-functioning democracy voters should elect parties and representatives with whom they agree on policy issues. The current paper investigates the extent to which Dutch voters in the 2017 parliamentary election had accurate information about parties’ policy positions. We elicit the extent to which voters think they vote for parties with whom they maximally agree (subjective congruence) and the extent to which this is actually true (objective congruence). Results show voters in our sample to have accurate information about approximately half of the policy positions of a random large party. Only 21.5 percent voted for a party with whom they were maximally objectively congruent. Objective congruence does not increase with information accuracy. Voters appear to consciously accept losses in terms of subjective congruence, as only 34.7 percent votes for a party with whom they think to be maximally congruent. These results are compatible with the interpretation of voters first choosing a party, and then (to some degree) adapting their personal policy positions to those of the chosen party.

AB - In a well-functioning democracy voters should elect parties and representatives with whom they agree on policy issues. The current paper investigates the extent to which Dutch voters in the 2017 parliamentary election had accurate information about parties’ policy positions. We elicit the extent to which voters think they vote for parties with whom they maximally agree (subjective congruence) and the extent to which this is actually true (objective congruence). Results show voters in our sample to have accurate information about approximately half of the policy positions of a random large party. Only 21.5 percent voted for a party with whom they were maximally objectively congruent. Objective congruence does not increase with information accuracy. Voters appear to consciously accept losses in terms of subjective congruence, as only 34.7 percent votes for a party with whom they think to be maximally congruent. These results are compatible with the interpretation of voters first choosing a party, and then (to some degree) adapting their personal policy positions to those of the chosen party.

U2 - 10.5117/MEM2019.3.002.PADM

DO - 10.5117/MEM2019.3.002.PADM

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 275

EP - 302

JO - Mens en Maatschappij

JF - Mens en Maatschappij

SN - 0025-9454

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 98320165