Publication

Frequent sickness absence, a signal to take action: a signal to take action

Notenbomer, A., 2019, [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 177 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 118 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 762 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 235 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 721 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 893 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 959 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 909 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 255 KB, PDF document

  • Summary

    Final publisher's version, 94.7 KB, PDF document

  • Samenvatting

    Final publisher's version, 124 KB, PDF document

  • List of Abbreviations

    Final publisher's version, 45.4 KB, PDF document

  • Dankwoord

    Final publisher's version, 74.1 KB, PDF document

  • About the author

    Final publisher's version, 47 KB, PDF document

  • SHARE

    Final publisher's version, 64.1 KB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 3.08 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 24 KB, PDF document

Frequent sickness absence, i.e. 3 or more sickness absence spells per year, has a prevalence of 6% in Dutch employees. We found that frequent absentees reported a lower work ability than employees with less sickness absence. Frequent absentees reported especially a lower ability to cope with job demands and experienced work impairment due to disease. According to frequent absentees, causes of frequent sickness absence are: high work and home demands, low job resources, poor health, chronic illness, unhealthy lifestyle, and diminished feeling of responsibility to attend work in case of low job resources, particularly when support from management is low. Addressing these factors and improving their own communication and communication skills were seen as measures to reduce frequent sickness absence. As frequent sickness absence also often predicts both future frequent and future long-term sickness absence, frequent sickness absence could be regarded as a signal to take action. A new e-health intervention was not effective as a stand-alone tool to reduce sickness absence among frequent absentees. This intervention could not be tested in combination with consultation with an occupational physician, as very few participants visited the occupational physician. For the prevention of future sickness absence it is important that frequent absentees and their employers become aware of frequent sickness absence and the risk of future sickness absence. Appropriate actions by the employer and/or the employee should follow.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
Supervisors/Advisors
Award date1-Jul-2019
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Publisher
Print ISBNs978-94-034-1623-6
Electronic ISBNs978-94-034-1622-9
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 83761809