Publication

Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Protocol for a Metaethnography Review

Cruz-Martinez, R. R., Noort, P. D., Asbjornsen, R. A., van Niekerk, J. M., Wentzel, J., Sanderman, R. & van Gemert-Pijnen, L., Jul-2019, In : JMIR research protocols. 8, 7, 12 p., 13334.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Cruz-Martinez, R. R., Noort, P. D., Asbjornsen, R. A., van Niekerk, J. M., Wentzel, J., Sanderman, R., & van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (2019). Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Protocol for a Metaethnography Review. JMIR research protocols, 8(7), [13334]. https://doi.org/10.2196/13334

Author

Cruz-Martinez, Roberto Rafael ; Noort, Peter Daniel ; Asbjornsen, Rikke Aune ; van Niekerk, Johan Magnus ; Wentzel, Jobke ; Sanderman, Robbert ; van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette. / Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies : Protocol for a Metaethnography Review. In: JMIR research protocols. 2019 ; Vol. 8, No. 7.

Harvard

Cruz-Martinez, RR, Noort, PD, Asbjornsen, RA, van Niekerk, JM, Wentzel, J, Sanderman, R & van Gemert-Pijnen, L 2019, 'Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Protocol for a Metaethnography Review', JMIR research protocols, vol. 8, no. 7, 13334. https://doi.org/10.2196/13334

Standard

Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies : Protocol for a Metaethnography Review. / Cruz-Martinez, Roberto Rafael; Noort, Peter Daniel; Asbjornsen, Rikke Aune; van Niekerk, Johan Magnus; Wentzel, Jobke; Sanderman, Robbert; van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette.

In: JMIR research protocols, Vol. 8, No. 7, 13334, 07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Cruz-Martinez RR, Noort PD, Asbjornsen RA, van Niekerk JM, Wentzel J, Sanderman R et al. Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Protocol for a Metaethnography Review. JMIR research protocols. 2019 Jul;8(7). 13334. https://doi.org/10.2196/13334


BibTeX

@article{ab28c300751f4a0aa47c4557fa1ea548,
title = "Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Protocol for a Metaethnography Review",
abstract = "Background: Electronic health (eHealth) is a multidisciplinary and rapidly evolving field, and thus requires research focused on knowledge accumulation, curation, and translation. Cardiovascular diseases constitute a global health care crisis in which eHealth can provide novel solutions to improve the efficiency and reach of self-management support for patients where they most need it: their homes and communities. A holistic understanding of eHealth projects focused on such case is required to bridge the multidisciplinary gap formed by the wide range of aims and approaches taken by the various disciplines involved.Objective: The primary objective of this review is to facilitate a holistic interpretation of eHealth projects aimed at providing self-management support of cardiovascular diseases in the natural setting of patients, thus priming the use of remote monitoring technologies. The review aims to synthesize the operationalization of frameworks, models, and theories applied to the research and development process of eHealth.Methods: We will use Noblit and Hare's metaethnography approach to review and synthesize researchers' and practitioners' reports on how they applied frameworks, models, and theories in their projects. We will systematically search the literature in 7 databases: Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, and the Cochrane Library. We will thoroughly read and code selected studies to extract both raw and contextual data for the synthesis. The relation of the studies will be determined according to the elements of the frameworks, models, or theories the studies applied. We will translate these elements between each other and intend to synthesize holistic principles for eHealth development for the case at hand.Results: The search strategy has been completed, data extraction is almost finalized, and the first synthesis approaches are underway. The search yielded 1224 citations and, after we applied the selection criteria, 17 articles remained. We expect to submit the final results for publication in 2019.Conclusions: This review is important because it aims to create a holistic understanding of a multidisciplinary topic at the crossroads of eHealth, cardiovascular diseases, and self-management. The value of metaethnography in contrast to other systematic review methods is that its synthesis approach seeks to generate a new understanding of a topic, while preserving the social and theoretical contexts in which findings emerge. Our results will show how useful this method can be in bridging the multidisciplinary gap of eHealth research and development, to inform and advance the importance of holistic approaches, while showcasing this approach for the case of self-management in cardiovascular diseases.",
keywords = "eHealth, telemedicine, research and development, implementation, evaluation, multidisciplinary approach, meta-ethnography, systematic review, remote monitoring, self-management, cardiovascular diseases, META-ETHNOGRAPHY",
author = "Cruz-Martinez, {Roberto Rafael} and Noort, {Peter Daniel} and Asbjornsen, {Rikke Aune} and {van Niekerk}, {Johan Magnus} and Jobke Wentzel and Robbert Sanderman and {van Gemert-Pijnen}, Lisette",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.2196/13334",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "JMIR research protocols",
issn = "1929-0748",
publisher = "JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Electronic Health Research and Development to Support Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies

T2 - Protocol for a Metaethnography Review

AU - Cruz-Martinez, Roberto Rafael

AU - Noort, Peter Daniel

AU - Asbjornsen, Rikke Aune

AU - van Niekerk, Johan Magnus

AU - Wentzel, Jobke

AU - Sanderman, Robbert

AU - van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Background: Electronic health (eHealth) is a multidisciplinary and rapidly evolving field, and thus requires research focused on knowledge accumulation, curation, and translation. Cardiovascular diseases constitute a global health care crisis in which eHealth can provide novel solutions to improve the efficiency and reach of self-management support for patients where they most need it: their homes and communities. A holistic understanding of eHealth projects focused on such case is required to bridge the multidisciplinary gap formed by the wide range of aims and approaches taken by the various disciplines involved.Objective: The primary objective of this review is to facilitate a holistic interpretation of eHealth projects aimed at providing self-management support of cardiovascular diseases in the natural setting of patients, thus priming the use of remote monitoring technologies. The review aims to synthesize the operationalization of frameworks, models, and theories applied to the research and development process of eHealth.Methods: We will use Noblit and Hare's metaethnography approach to review and synthesize researchers' and practitioners' reports on how they applied frameworks, models, and theories in their projects. We will systematically search the literature in 7 databases: Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, and the Cochrane Library. We will thoroughly read and code selected studies to extract both raw and contextual data for the synthesis. The relation of the studies will be determined according to the elements of the frameworks, models, or theories the studies applied. We will translate these elements between each other and intend to synthesize holistic principles for eHealth development for the case at hand.Results: The search strategy has been completed, data extraction is almost finalized, and the first synthesis approaches are underway. The search yielded 1224 citations and, after we applied the selection criteria, 17 articles remained. We expect to submit the final results for publication in 2019.Conclusions: This review is important because it aims to create a holistic understanding of a multidisciplinary topic at the crossroads of eHealth, cardiovascular diseases, and self-management. The value of metaethnography in contrast to other systematic review methods is that its synthesis approach seeks to generate a new understanding of a topic, while preserving the social and theoretical contexts in which findings emerge. Our results will show how useful this method can be in bridging the multidisciplinary gap of eHealth research and development, to inform and advance the importance of holistic approaches, while showcasing this approach for the case of self-management in cardiovascular diseases.

AB - Background: Electronic health (eHealth) is a multidisciplinary and rapidly evolving field, and thus requires research focused on knowledge accumulation, curation, and translation. Cardiovascular diseases constitute a global health care crisis in which eHealth can provide novel solutions to improve the efficiency and reach of self-management support for patients where they most need it: their homes and communities. A holistic understanding of eHealth projects focused on such case is required to bridge the multidisciplinary gap formed by the wide range of aims and approaches taken by the various disciplines involved.Objective: The primary objective of this review is to facilitate a holistic interpretation of eHealth projects aimed at providing self-management support of cardiovascular diseases in the natural setting of patients, thus priming the use of remote monitoring technologies. The review aims to synthesize the operationalization of frameworks, models, and theories applied to the research and development process of eHealth.Methods: We will use Noblit and Hare's metaethnography approach to review and synthesize researchers' and practitioners' reports on how they applied frameworks, models, and theories in their projects. We will systematically search the literature in 7 databases: Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, and the Cochrane Library. We will thoroughly read and code selected studies to extract both raw and contextual data for the synthesis. The relation of the studies will be determined according to the elements of the frameworks, models, or theories the studies applied. We will translate these elements between each other and intend to synthesize holistic principles for eHealth development for the case at hand.Results: The search strategy has been completed, data extraction is almost finalized, and the first synthesis approaches are underway. The search yielded 1224 citations and, after we applied the selection criteria, 17 articles remained. We expect to submit the final results for publication in 2019.Conclusions: This review is important because it aims to create a holistic understanding of a multidisciplinary topic at the crossroads of eHealth, cardiovascular diseases, and self-management. The value of metaethnography in contrast to other systematic review methods is that its synthesis approach seeks to generate a new understanding of a topic, while preserving the social and theoretical contexts in which findings emerge. Our results will show how useful this method can be in bridging the multidisciplinary gap of eHealth research and development, to inform and advance the importance of holistic approaches, while showcasing this approach for the case of self-management in cardiovascular diseases.

KW - eHealth

KW - telemedicine

KW - research and development

KW - implementation

KW - evaluation

KW - multidisciplinary approach

KW - meta-ethnography

KW - systematic review

KW - remote monitoring

KW - self-management

KW - cardiovascular diseases

KW - META-ETHNOGRAPHY

U2 - 10.2196/13334

DO - 10.2196/13334

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

JO - JMIR research protocols

JF - JMIR research protocols

SN - 1929-0748

IS - 7

M1 - 13334

ER -

ID: 95436131