Publication

Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a1-year randomized controlled trial

Slagter, K. W., Meijer, H. J. A., Bakker, N. A., Vissink, A. & Raghoebar, G. M., Aug-2015, In : Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 42, 8, p. 773-782 10 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Slagter, K. W., Meijer, H. J. A., Bakker, N. A., Vissink, A., & Raghoebar, G. M. (2015). Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a1-year randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(8), 773-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12429

Author

Slagter, Kirsten W. ; Meijer, Henny J. A. ; Bakker, Nicolaas A. ; Vissink, Arjan ; Raghoebar, Gerry M. / Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone : a1-year randomized controlled trial. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2015 ; Vol. 42, No. 8. pp. 773-782.

Harvard

Slagter, KW, Meijer, HJA, Bakker, NA, Vissink, A & Raghoebar, GM 2015, 'Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a1-year randomized controlled trial', Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 773-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12429

Standard

Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone : a1-year randomized controlled trial. / Slagter, Kirsten W.; Meijer, Henny J. A.; Bakker, Nicolaas A.; Vissink, Arjan; Raghoebar, Gerry M.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 42, No. 8, 08.2015, p. 773-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Slagter KW, Meijer HJA, Bakker NA, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a1-year randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2015 Aug;42(8):773-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12429


BibTeX

@article{114c99f10629434fa1c6ca9db4bd55aa,
title = "Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a1-year randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "AimTo assess whether outcome of immediate implant placement and immediate provisionalization after 1year was non-inferior to immediate implant placement and delayed provisionalization regarding Marginal Bone Level (MBL).Materials and MethodsForty patients with a failing tooth in the aesthetic zone were randomly assigned for immediate implant placement with immediate (n=20) or delayed (n=20) provisionalization. Follow-up was at 1month and after 1year. The study was powered to detect a difference in MBL ofResultsAfter 1year, MBL changes were -0.750.69 mesially and -0.68 +/- 0.65 distally mm for the immediate group and -0.70 +/- 0.64 and -0.68 +/- 0.64mm for the delayed group respectively (NS). Regarding differences in means, non-inferiority was observed after 1year (mesially: Group A versus B: difference in mean 0.08mm (95% CI -0.38 to 0.53, p=0.71 distally: Group A versus B: difference in mean 0.09mm (95% CI -0.37 to 0.56mm, p=0.66).No significant differences in the other outcome variables were observed.ConclusionsThis study showed that immediate placement and immediate provisionalization was non-inferior to immediate placement with delayed provisionalization. In addition, although not powered for these outcome variables, no clinically relevant differences in other outcomes were observed (: ISRCTN57251089).",
keywords = "aesthetic region, dental implants, immediate placement, randomized controlled trial, FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS, CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS, DENTAL IMPLANTS, FOLLOW-UP, SITES, CROWNS, SOFT, RECESSION, SURVIVAL, CRITERIA",
author = "Slagter, {Kirsten W.} and Meijer, {Henny J. A.} and Bakker, {Nicolaas A.} and Arjan Vissink and Raghoebar, {Gerry M.}",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/jcpe.12429",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "773--782",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone

T2 - a1-year randomized controlled trial

AU - Slagter, Kirsten W.

AU - Meijer, Henny J. A.

AU - Bakker, Nicolaas A.

AU - Vissink, Arjan

AU - Raghoebar, Gerry M.

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - AimTo assess whether outcome of immediate implant placement and immediate provisionalization after 1year was non-inferior to immediate implant placement and delayed provisionalization regarding Marginal Bone Level (MBL).Materials and MethodsForty patients with a failing tooth in the aesthetic zone were randomly assigned for immediate implant placement with immediate (n=20) or delayed (n=20) provisionalization. Follow-up was at 1month and after 1year. The study was powered to detect a difference in MBL ofResultsAfter 1year, MBL changes were -0.750.69 mesially and -0.68 +/- 0.65 distally mm for the immediate group and -0.70 +/- 0.64 and -0.68 +/- 0.64mm for the delayed group respectively (NS). Regarding differences in means, non-inferiority was observed after 1year (mesially: Group A versus B: difference in mean 0.08mm (95% CI -0.38 to 0.53, p=0.71 distally: Group A versus B: difference in mean 0.09mm (95% CI -0.37 to 0.56mm, p=0.66).No significant differences in the other outcome variables were observed.ConclusionsThis study showed that immediate placement and immediate provisionalization was non-inferior to immediate placement with delayed provisionalization. In addition, although not powered for these outcome variables, no clinically relevant differences in other outcomes were observed (: ISRCTN57251089).

AB - AimTo assess whether outcome of immediate implant placement and immediate provisionalization after 1year was non-inferior to immediate implant placement and delayed provisionalization regarding Marginal Bone Level (MBL).Materials and MethodsForty patients with a failing tooth in the aesthetic zone were randomly assigned for immediate implant placement with immediate (n=20) or delayed (n=20) provisionalization. Follow-up was at 1month and after 1year. The study was powered to detect a difference in MBL ofResultsAfter 1year, MBL changes were -0.750.69 mesially and -0.68 +/- 0.65 distally mm for the immediate group and -0.70 +/- 0.64 and -0.68 +/- 0.64mm for the delayed group respectively (NS). Regarding differences in means, non-inferiority was observed after 1year (mesially: Group A versus B: difference in mean 0.08mm (95% CI -0.38 to 0.53, p=0.71 distally: Group A versus B: difference in mean 0.09mm (95% CI -0.37 to 0.56mm, p=0.66).No significant differences in the other outcome variables were observed.ConclusionsThis study showed that immediate placement and immediate provisionalization was non-inferior to immediate placement with delayed provisionalization. In addition, although not powered for these outcome variables, no clinically relevant differences in other outcomes were observed (: ISRCTN57251089).

KW - aesthetic region

KW - dental implants

KW - immediate placement

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS

KW - CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS

KW - DENTAL IMPLANTS

KW - FOLLOW-UP

KW - SITES

KW - CROWNS

KW - SOFT

KW - RECESSION

KW - SURVIVAL

KW - CRITERIA

U2 - 10.1111/jcpe.12429

DO - 10.1111/jcpe.12429

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 773

EP - 782

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 24309373