Publication

Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions

Selivanova, A. & Krabbe, P. F. M., 5-Jan-2018, In : PLoS ONE. 13, 1, 14 p., 0190111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Selivanova, A., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2018). Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions. PLoS ONE, 13(1), [0190111]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190111

Author

Selivanova, Anna ; Krabbe, Paul F. M. / Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions. In: PLoS ONE. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.

Harvard

Selivanova, A & Krabbe, PFM 2018, 'Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions', PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 1, 0190111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190111

Standard

Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions. / Selivanova, Anna; Krabbe, Paul F. M.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 1, 0190111, 05.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Selivanova A, Krabbe PFM. Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions. PLoS ONE. 2018 Jan 5;13(1). 0190111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190111


BibTeX

@article{a0963c23af124515bbf4c8fe3046774a,
title = "Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions",
abstract = "IntroductionA crucial assumption in health valuation methods is that respondents pay equal attention to all information components presented in the response task. So far, there is no solid evidence that respondents are fulfilling this condition. The aim of our study is to explore the attendance to various information cues presented in the discrete choice ( DC) response tasks.MethodsEye tracking was used to study the eye movements and fixations on specific information areas. This was done for seven DC response tasks comprising health-state descriptions. A sample of 10 respondents participated in the study. Videos of their eye movements were recorded and are presented graphically. Frequencies were computed for length of fixation and number of fixations, so differences in attendance were demonstrated for particular attributes in the tasks.ResultsAll respondents completed the survey. Respondents were fixating on the left-sided health-state descriptions slightly longer than on the right-sided. Fatigue was not observed, as the time spent did not decrease in the final response tasks. The time spent on the tasks depended on the difficulty of the task and the amount of information presented.Discussion and conclusionEye tracking proved to be a feasible method to study the process of paying attention and fixating on health-state descriptions in the DC response tasks. Eye tracking facilitates the investigation of whether respondents fully read the information in health descriptions or whether they ignore particular elements.",
keywords = "Journal Article, ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE, TIME TRADE-OFF, CHOICE EXPERIMENTS, STANDARD GAMBLE, MOVEMENTS, ATTENTION, SETS, UTILITIES, VALUATION, FATIGUE",
author = "Anna Selivanova and Krabbe, {Paul F. M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0190111",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLOS-One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions

AU - Selivanova, Anna

AU - Krabbe, Paul F. M.

PY - 2018/1/5

Y1 - 2018/1/5

N2 - IntroductionA crucial assumption in health valuation methods is that respondents pay equal attention to all information components presented in the response task. So far, there is no solid evidence that respondents are fulfilling this condition. The aim of our study is to explore the attendance to various information cues presented in the discrete choice ( DC) response tasks.MethodsEye tracking was used to study the eye movements and fixations on specific information areas. This was done for seven DC response tasks comprising health-state descriptions. A sample of 10 respondents participated in the study. Videos of their eye movements were recorded and are presented graphically. Frequencies were computed for length of fixation and number of fixations, so differences in attendance were demonstrated for particular attributes in the tasks.ResultsAll respondents completed the survey. Respondents were fixating on the left-sided health-state descriptions slightly longer than on the right-sided. Fatigue was not observed, as the time spent did not decrease in the final response tasks. The time spent on the tasks depended on the difficulty of the task and the amount of information presented.Discussion and conclusionEye tracking proved to be a feasible method to study the process of paying attention and fixating on health-state descriptions in the DC response tasks. Eye tracking facilitates the investigation of whether respondents fully read the information in health descriptions or whether they ignore particular elements.

AB - IntroductionA crucial assumption in health valuation methods is that respondents pay equal attention to all information components presented in the response task. So far, there is no solid evidence that respondents are fulfilling this condition. The aim of our study is to explore the attendance to various information cues presented in the discrete choice ( DC) response tasks.MethodsEye tracking was used to study the eye movements and fixations on specific information areas. This was done for seven DC response tasks comprising health-state descriptions. A sample of 10 respondents participated in the study. Videos of their eye movements were recorded and are presented graphically. Frequencies were computed for length of fixation and number of fixations, so differences in attendance were demonstrated for particular attributes in the tasks.ResultsAll respondents completed the survey. Respondents were fixating on the left-sided health-state descriptions slightly longer than on the right-sided. Fatigue was not observed, as the time spent did not decrease in the final response tasks. The time spent on the tasks depended on the difficulty of the task and the amount of information presented.Discussion and conclusionEye tracking proved to be a feasible method to study the process of paying attention and fixating on health-state descriptions in the DC response tasks. Eye tracking facilitates the investigation of whether respondents fully read the information in health descriptions or whether they ignore particular elements.

KW - Journal Article

KW - ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE

KW - TIME TRADE-OFF

KW - CHOICE EXPERIMENTS

KW - STANDARD GAMBLE

KW - MOVEMENTS

KW - ATTENTION

KW - SETS

KW - UTILITIES

KW - VALUATION

KW - FATIGUE

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0190111

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0190111

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - PLOS-One

JF - PLOS-One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - 0190111

ER -

ID: 52856473