Publication

Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme

Jellema, H., Kremer, S., Mackor, A-R. & Molewijk, B., May-2017, In : Bioethics. 31, 4, p. 277-285 9 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Jellema, H., Kremer, S., Mackor, A-R., & Molewijk, B. (2017). Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme. Bioethics, 31(4), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12346

Author

Jellema, Hylke ; Kremer, Swanny ; Mackor, Anne-Ruth ; Molewijk, Bert. / Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations : A Coding Scheme. In: Bioethics. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 277-285.

Harvard

Jellema, H, Kremer, S, Mackor, A-R & Molewijk, B 2017, 'Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme', Bioethics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12346

Standard

Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations : A Coding Scheme. / Jellema, Hylke; Kremer, Swanny; Mackor, Anne-Ruth; Molewijk, Bert.

In: Bioethics, Vol. 31, No. 4, 05.2017, p. 277-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Jellema H, Kremer S, Mackor A-R, Molewijk B. Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme. Bioethics. 2017 May;31(4):277-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12346


BibTeX

@article{91e70864f4c545bbaeabcd11a977fe21,
title = "Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme",
abstract = "Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) is an up and coming form of ethics support wherein clinical professionals deliberate about moral questions they face in their work. So far, it has been unclear what quality of deliberation in MCD is entailed and how to evaluate this quality. This article proposes a coding scheme that fits the theoretical background of MCD and allows researchers to evaluate the quality of the deliberation in MCDs. We consider deliberation in MCD to be of good quality when participants enrich their own understanding of a case by being exposed to the viewpoints of others. In order to have such an enriching effect, the deliberation in an MCD ought to involve different kinds of arguments from the perspectives of different stakeholders and in favour of different resolutions to the case; and the process of deliberation ought to be critical but constructive.",
keywords = "moral case deliberation, pragmatic hermeneutics, dialogical ethics, clinical ethics support, coding scheme, deliberative quality, ETHICS, STUDENTS",
author = "Hylke Jellema and Swanny Kremer and Anne-Ruth Mackor and Bert Molewijk",
year = "2017",
month = may,
doi = "10.1111/bioe.12346",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "277--285",
journal = "Bioethics",
issn = "0269-9702",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations

T2 - A Coding Scheme

AU - Jellema, Hylke

AU - Kremer, Swanny

AU - Mackor, Anne-Ruth

AU - Molewijk, Bert

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) is an up and coming form of ethics support wherein clinical professionals deliberate about moral questions they face in their work. So far, it has been unclear what quality of deliberation in MCD is entailed and how to evaluate this quality. This article proposes a coding scheme that fits the theoretical background of MCD and allows researchers to evaluate the quality of the deliberation in MCDs. We consider deliberation in MCD to be of good quality when participants enrich their own understanding of a case by being exposed to the viewpoints of others. In order to have such an enriching effect, the deliberation in an MCD ought to involve different kinds of arguments from the perspectives of different stakeholders and in favour of different resolutions to the case; and the process of deliberation ought to be critical but constructive.

AB - Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) is an up and coming form of ethics support wherein clinical professionals deliberate about moral questions they face in their work. So far, it has been unclear what quality of deliberation in MCD is entailed and how to evaluate this quality. This article proposes a coding scheme that fits the theoretical background of MCD and allows researchers to evaluate the quality of the deliberation in MCDs. We consider deliberation in MCD to be of good quality when participants enrich their own understanding of a case by being exposed to the viewpoints of others. In order to have such an enriching effect, the deliberation in an MCD ought to involve different kinds of arguments from the perspectives of different stakeholders and in favour of different resolutions to the case; and the process of deliberation ought to be critical but constructive.

KW - moral case deliberation

KW - pragmatic hermeneutics

KW - dialogical ethics

KW - clinical ethics support

KW - coding scheme

KW - deliberative quality

KW - ETHICS

KW - STUDENTS

U2 - 10.1111/bioe.12346

DO - 10.1111/bioe.12346

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 277

EP - 285

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 41715240