Endograft treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using the talent aortouniiliac system: An international multicenter study

Peppelenbosch, N., Geelkerken, R. H., Soong, C., Cao, P., Steinmetz, O. K., Teijink, J. A. W., Lepantalo, M., de Letter, J., Vermassen, F. E. G., DeRose, G., Buskens, E. & Buth, J., 2006, In : Journal of Vascular Surgery. 43, 6, p. 1111-1121 11 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Copy link to clipboard


  • N. Peppelenbosch
  • R.H. Geelkerken
  • C. Soong
  • P. Cao
  • O.K. Steinmetz
  • J.A.W. Teijink
  • M. Lepantalo
  • J. de Letter
  • F.E.G. Vermassen
  • G. DeRose
  • E. Buskens
  • J. Buth
Objective: To understand the potential of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients presenting with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), the proportion in whom this procedure was applicable was assessed. Mortality and morbidity was also determined in patients treated with emergency EVAR (eEVAR) when anatomic and hemodynamic conditions allowed (ie, in the entire cohort with patients receiving endovascular and open repair combined). In addition, a comparison was made between the treatment group with eEVAR and open repair. Methods. Between February 2003 and September 2004, 10 participating institutions enrolled a representative sample of 100 consecutive patients in whom eEVAR was considered. Patients in the New Endograft treatment in Ruptured abdominal aortic Aneurysm (ERA) trial were offered eEVAR or open repair in accordance with their clinical condition or anatomic configuration. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal representatives. The study included patients who were treated by stent-graft technique or by open surgery in the case of adverse anatomy for endoluminal stent-grafting or severe hemodynamic instability, or both. Data were collated in a centralized database for analysis. The study was sponsored and supported by Medtronic, and eEVAR was uniquely performed with a Talent aortouniiliac (AUI) system in all patients. Crude and adjusted 30-day or in-hospital and 3-month mortality rates were assessed for the entire group as a whole and the EVAR and open repair category separately. Complication rates were also assessed. Results: Stent-graft repair was performed in 49 patients and open surgery in 51. No significant differences were observed between these treatment groups with regard to comorbidity at presentation, hemodynamic instability, and the proportion of patients who could be assessed by preoperative computed tomography scanning. Patients with eEVAR more frequently demonstrated a suitable infrarenal neck for endovascular repair, a longer infrarenal neck, and suitable iliac arteries for access than patients with open repair. The primary reason to perform open aneurysm repair was an unfavorable configuration of the neck in 80% of the patients. In patients undergoing eEVAR, operative blood loss was less, intensive care admission time was shorter, and the duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter (P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1111-1121
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 2872815