Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E-J., Klugkist, I. G., Rouder, J. N., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M. D., Morey, R. D., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z. & van Ravenzwaaij, D., Jun-2020, In : Nature Human Behaviour. 4, 6, p. 561-563 3 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

  • Balazs Aczel
  • Rink Hoekstra
  • Andrew Gelman
  • Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  • Irene G. Klugkist
  • Jeffrey N. Rouder
  • Joachim Vandekerckhove
  • Michael D. Lee
  • Richard D. Morey
  • Wolf Vanpaemel
  • Zoltan Dienes
  • Don van Ravenzwaaij

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-563
Number of pages3
JournalNature Human Behaviour
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Jun-2020

ID: 112163446