Dilemmas in child protection: Methods and decision-maker factors influencing decision-making in child maltreatment cases

Bartelink, C., 2018, [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 168 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)Academic

Copy link to clipboard


  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 124 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 155 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 223 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 169 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 201 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 274 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 240 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 199 KB, PDF document

  • References

    Final publisher's version, 302 KB, PDF document

  • Samenvatting

    Final publisher's version, 120 KB, PDF document

  • Summary

    Final publisher's version, 118 KB, PDF document

  • Dankwoord

    Final publisher's version, 63 KB, PDF document

  • About the author

    Final publisher's version, 58 KB, PDF document

  • Publications

    Final publisher's version, 1 MB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 2 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 22 KB, PDF document

  • Cora Bartelink
Child maltreatment is an important problem. High quality decision-making is crucial to determine whether child abuse or neglect occurs. This dissertation aims to gain insight into the factors which influence the decision-making of professionals in child welfare and child protection and which could improve decision-making in cases of (suspected) child maltreatment. Therefore, research was conducted on: 1) the effects of structured decision-making on the quality of judgments and decisions (the so-called ORBA method); 2) the effects of the use of a risk assessment instrument (LIRIK) on the agreement and predictive validity of risk estimations; 3) how professionals reason about the intervention recommendations. The effects of the structured decision-making method and the risk assessment instrument both appear to be limited. They support professionals in considering more relevant case factors. However, their use did not increase agreement on judgments in child maltreatment cases. Furthermore, professionals’ decision-making was substantially influenced by their personal reasoning and attitudes regarding child abuse and out-of-home placement. This finding provides a potential explanation for the limited effects of the use of ORBA and LIRIK we found: such methods and instruments do not seem to counteract personal attitudes and reasoning. Therefore, it is necessary to find additional ways to improve decision-making, besides the use of tools such as ORBA and LIRIK. This may include, among other things, so-called ‘critical thinking’ (systematically considering – potentially in teams – alternative explanations, purposefully generating arguments and counterarguments for the interventions proposed and for alternative interventions) and more often shared decision-making with parents and children.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Yperen, van, Tom, Supervisor
  • Knorth, Erik, Supervisor
  • ten Berge, Ingrid J., Co-supervisor, External person
  • Grietens, Hans, Assessment committee
  • Fluke, John D., Assessment committee, External person
  • Lindauer, Ramon J. L., Assessment committee, External person
Award date1-Feb-2018
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Print ISBNs978-94-034-0327-4
Electronic ISBNs978-94-034-0326-7
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 53170576