Publication

Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients: a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes

Alberga, J. M., Stellingsma, K., Meijer, H. J. A., Oostenbrink, H. A., Vissink, A. & Raghoebar, G. M., Jul-2020, In : International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 49, 7, p. 952-959 8 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Alberga, J. M., Stellingsma, K., Meijer, H. J. A., Oostenbrink, H. A., Vissink, A., & Raghoebar, G. M. (2020). Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients: a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(7), 952-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007

Author

Alberga, J M ; Stellingsma, K ; Meijer, H J A ; Oostenbrink, H A ; Vissink, A ; Raghoebar, G M. / Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients : a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020 ; Vol. 49, No. 7. pp. 952-959.

Harvard

Alberga, JM, Stellingsma, K, Meijer, HJA, Oostenbrink, HA, Vissink, A & Raghoebar, GM 2020, 'Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients: a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes', International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 952-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007

Standard

Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients : a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. / Alberga, J M; Stellingsma, K; Meijer, H J A; Oostenbrink, H A; Vissink, A; Raghoebar, G M.

In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 49, No. 7, 07.2020, p. 952-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Alberga JM, Stellingsma K, Meijer HJA, Oostenbrink HA, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients: a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020 Jul;49(7):952-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007


BibTeX

@article{0372de524e704b469920bb0161ddafcb,
title = "Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients: a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes",
abstract = "The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction, following dental implant therapy in cleft patients. Implant survival, changes in marginal bone level, pocket probing depths, plaque and bleeding indices, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction were assessed in 17 alveolar cleft patients and 17 matched controls. At follow-up (mean 72.4 +/- 46.4 months), one implant had been lost in the cleft group. Mean marginal bone loss at follow-up was -0.4 +/- 0.4 mm in cleft patients and -0.2 +/- 0.4 mm in controls. Aesthetics of the peri-implant soft tissues (pink aesthetic score) were less favourable (P = 0.025) in cleft patients (5.0 +/- 1.9) than in controls (6.5 +/- 1.7), while peri-implant parameters were comparable in the two groups. Overall patient satisfaction was 8.6 +/- 0.9 in cleft patients and 8.9 +/- 1.1 in controls (P = 0.331). In cleft patients, no difference in aesthetics was observed between patients who received additional bone augmentation at 3 months prior to implant placement and those who did not (P = 0.092). Dental implant therapy in cleft patients is associated with high implant survival, minor marginal bone loss, healthy peri-implant soft tissues, and high patient satisfaction. Only the aesthetics of the soft tissues was worse in cleft patients compared to augmented non-cleft patients.",
keywords = "cleft lip palate, alveolar bone grafting, dental implants, single tooth, aesthetics, patient satisfaction, SINGLE-TOOTH REPLACEMENTS, PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION, PALATE PATIENTS, FOLLOW-UP, LIP, RECONSTRUCTION, GRAFTS",
author = "Alberga, {J M} and K Stellingsma and Meijer, {H J A} and Oostenbrink, {H A} and A Vissink and Raghoebar, {G M}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "952--959",
journal = "International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0901-5027",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dental implant placement in alveolar cleft patients

T2 - a retrospective comparative study on clinical and aesthetic outcomes

AU - Alberga, J M

AU - Stellingsma, K

AU - Meijer, H J A

AU - Oostenbrink, H A

AU - Vissink, A

AU - Raghoebar, G M

N1 - Copyright © 2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction, following dental implant therapy in cleft patients. Implant survival, changes in marginal bone level, pocket probing depths, plaque and bleeding indices, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction were assessed in 17 alveolar cleft patients and 17 matched controls. At follow-up (mean 72.4 +/- 46.4 months), one implant had been lost in the cleft group. Mean marginal bone loss at follow-up was -0.4 +/- 0.4 mm in cleft patients and -0.2 +/- 0.4 mm in controls. Aesthetics of the peri-implant soft tissues (pink aesthetic score) were less favourable (P = 0.025) in cleft patients (5.0 +/- 1.9) than in controls (6.5 +/- 1.7), while peri-implant parameters were comparable in the two groups. Overall patient satisfaction was 8.6 +/- 0.9 in cleft patients and 8.9 +/- 1.1 in controls (P = 0.331). In cleft patients, no difference in aesthetics was observed between patients who received additional bone augmentation at 3 months prior to implant placement and those who did not (P = 0.092). Dental implant therapy in cleft patients is associated with high implant survival, minor marginal bone loss, healthy peri-implant soft tissues, and high patient satisfaction. Only the aesthetics of the soft tissues was worse in cleft patients compared to augmented non-cleft patients.

AB - The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction, following dental implant therapy in cleft patients. Implant survival, changes in marginal bone level, pocket probing depths, plaque and bleeding indices, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction were assessed in 17 alveolar cleft patients and 17 matched controls. At follow-up (mean 72.4 +/- 46.4 months), one implant had been lost in the cleft group. Mean marginal bone loss at follow-up was -0.4 +/- 0.4 mm in cleft patients and -0.2 +/- 0.4 mm in controls. Aesthetics of the peri-implant soft tissues (pink aesthetic score) were less favourable (P = 0.025) in cleft patients (5.0 +/- 1.9) than in controls (6.5 +/- 1.7), while peri-implant parameters were comparable in the two groups. Overall patient satisfaction was 8.6 +/- 0.9 in cleft patients and 8.9 +/- 1.1 in controls (P = 0.331). In cleft patients, no difference in aesthetics was observed between patients who received additional bone augmentation at 3 months prior to implant placement and those who did not (P = 0.092). Dental implant therapy in cleft patients is associated with high implant survival, minor marginal bone loss, healthy peri-implant soft tissues, and high patient satisfaction. Only the aesthetics of the soft tissues was worse in cleft patients compared to augmented non-cleft patients.

KW - cleft lip palate

KW - alveolar bone grafting

KW - dental implants

KW - single tooth

KW - aesthetics

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - SINGLE-TOOTH REPLACEMENTS

KW - PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION

KW - PALATE PATIENTS

KW - FOLLOW-UP

KW - LIP

KW - RECONSTRUCTION

KW - GRAFTS

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 952

EP - 959

JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0901-5027

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 119034330