Publication

Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands

Dijkstra, I. S., Brand, P. L. P., Pols, J., Delwig, H., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C. & Tulleken, J. E., Dec-2017, In : Journal of Critical Care. 42, p. 47-53 7 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Dijkstra, I. S., Brand, P. L. P., Pols, J., Delwig, H., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C., & Tulleken, J. E. (2017). Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands. Journal of Critical Care, 42, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.018

Author

Dijkstra, Ids S. ; Brand, Paul L. P. ; Pols, Jan ; Delwig, Hans ; Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. ; Tulleken, Jaap E. / Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2017 ; Vol. 42. pp. 47-53.

Harvard

Dijkstra, IS, Brand, PLP, Pols, J, Delwig, H, Jaarsma, DADC & Tulleken, JE 2017, 'Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands', Journal of Critical Care, vol. 42, pp. 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.018

Standard

Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands. / Dijkstra, Ids S.; Brand, Paul L. P.; Pols, Jan; Delwig, Hans; Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C.; Tulleken, Jaap E.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 42, 12.2017, p. 47-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Dijkstra IS, Brand PLP, Pols J, Delwig H, Jaarsma DADC, Tulleken JE. Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice? A case study from The Netherlands. Journal of Critical Care. 2017 Dec;42:47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.018


BibTeX

@article{c130974fa06e438c9a9760c481de773f,
title = "Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice?: A case study from The Netherlands",
abstract = "Purpose: An evaluation of the alignment between intensive care medicine (ICM) training and practice provides valuable information for the development of ICM training. Therefore this study examines how well recently licensed intensivists feel prepared for practice and whether intensivists from different background specialties attain comparable preparedness rates.Methods: An inventory was developed to cover the tasks that constitute ICM practice. Two hundred five recently licensed Dutch intensivists received a questionnaire in which they could indicate how well their ICM training programme prepared them for these tasks on a 5-point Likert scale.Results: Ninety-one respondents returned the questionnaire (response 45{\%}). Respondents felt excellently prepared for 67 tasks, well prepared for 16 tasks, marginally sufficiently prepared for 6 tasks and insufficiently prepared for 15 tasks. Intensivists from anaesthesiology felt better prepared for IC specific activities (mean 4.25, SD 0.38) than those from internal medicine (mean 4.01, SD 0.40, P=.02). Average scores on tasks related to medical expertise were relatively high while tasks relating to management and leadership, science and professional development scored lower.Conclusions: Although recently licensed intensivists are well prepared for most tasks in ICM, lower preparedness scores on tasks related to leadership and management, science, and professional development call for re-evaluation of the current curriculum.",
keywords = "CoBaTrICE, Preparedness for practice, Competency-based education, ICM-training, Evaluation, MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH, CARE MEDICINE, ENVIRONMENT, CURRICULUM, COMPETENCES, TRANSITION, CONSULTANT, PHYSICIAN, OUTCOMES, DOCTORS",
author = "Dijkstra, {Ids S.} and Brand, {Paul L. P.} and Jan Pols and Hans Delwig and Jaarsma, {Debbie A. D. C.} and Tulleken, {Jaap E.}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.018",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "47--53",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are graduated intensivists prepared for practice?

T2 - A case study from The Netherlands

AU - Dijkstra, Ids S.

AU - Brand, Paul L. P.

AU - Pols, Jan

AU - Delwig, Hans

AU - Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C.

AU - Tulleken, Jaap E.

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Purpose: An evaluation of the alignment between intensive care medicine (ICM) training and practice provides valuable information for the development of ICM training. Therefore this study examines how well recently licensed intensivists feel prepared for practice and whether intensivists from different background specialties attain comparable preparedness rates.Methods: An inventory was developed to cover the tasks that constitute ICM practice. Two hundred five recently licensed Dutch intensivists received a questionnaire in which they could indicate how well their ICM training programme prepared them for these tasks on a 5-point Likert scale.Results: Ninety-one respondents returned the questionnaire (response 45%). Respondents felt excellently prepared for 67 tasks, well prepared for 16 tasks, marginally sufficiently prepared for 6 tasks and insufficiently prepared for 15 tasks. Intensivists from anaesthesiology felt better prepared for IC specific activities (mean 4.25, SD 0.38) than those from internal medicine (mean 4.01, SD 0.40, P=.02). Average scores on tasks related to medical expertise were relatively high while tasks relating to management and leadership, science and professional development scored lower.Conclusions: Although recently licensed intensivists are well prepared for most tasks in ICM, lower preparedness scores on tasks related to leadership and management, science, and professional development call for re-evaluation of the current curriculum.

AB - Purpose: An evaluation of the alignment between intensive care medicine (ICM) training and practice provides valuable information for the development of ICM training. Therefore this study examines how well recently licensed intensivists feel prepared for practice and whether intensivists from different background specialties attain comparable preparedness rates.Methods: An inventory was developed to cover the tasks that constitute ICM practice. Two hundred five recently licensed Dutch intensivists received a questionnaire in which they could indicate how well their ICM training programme prepared them for these tasks on a 5-point Likert scale.Results: Ninety-one respondents returned the questionnaire (response 45%). Respondents felt excellently prepared for 67 tasks, well prepared for 16 tasks, marginally sufficiently prepared for 6 tasks and insufficiently prepared for 15 tasks. Intensivists from anaesthesiology felt better prepared for IC specific activities (mean 4.25, SD 0.38) than those from internal medicine (mean 4.01, SD 0.40, P=.02). Average scores on tasks related to medical expertise were relatively high while tasks relating to management and leadership, science and professional development scored lower.Conclusions: Although recently licensed intensivists are well prepared for most tasks in ICM, lower preparedness scores on tasks related to leadership and management, science, and professional development call for re-evaluation of the current curriculum.

KW - CoBaTrICE

KW - Preparedness for practice

KW - Competency-based education

KW - ICM-training

KW - Evaluation

KW - MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH

KW - CARE MEDICINE

KW - ENVIRONMENT

KW - CURRICULUM

KW - COMPETENCES

KW - TRANSITION

KW - CONSULTANT

KW - PHYSICIAN

KW - OUTCOMES

KW - DOCTORS

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.018

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 47

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

ER -

ID: 46835496