Publication

Are conservative quantifiers easier to learn ? Evidence from novel quantifier experiments

Spenader, J. & Villiers, J. D., 2019, Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium. Schlöder, J. J., McHugh, D. & Roelofsen, F. (eds.). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, p. 504-512 9 p.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Natural language quantificational determiners seem to always be conservative. Some researchers suggest that one explanation for this link between syntactic form and semantic interpretation may be due to conservative quantifiers being easier to learn. Previous experimental research showed that children learned a conservative novel quantifier (i.e. not all more easily than a novel non-conservative quantifier (i.e. not only) [Hunter and Lidz, 2013]. In a series of four experiments we further investigated this learnability claim. Experiment 1 replicated the original study, but with adult participants. We found no evidence that the conservative novel quantifier was easier to learn. Experiment 2 replicated and extended the original study, testing children. Again, we found no difference between the quantifiers. Experiments 3 and 4 introduce a new training and testing method, situation verification with correction. In Experiment 3, we tested this new method with known quantifier meanings, conservative all and non-conservative only, using a novel quantifier expression. Children were highly successful, and there was no difference between the two quantifier meanings. In Experiment 4, we used the same method to teach children the novel conservative and non-conservative meanings not all and not only. Most children were unable to learn either quantifier, and we again found no difference between the conservative and non-conservative quantifier in terms of learnability. In conclusion, in four experiments, we failed to replicate findings that conservative quantifiers are easier to learn. These results suggest that a learnability advantage is not a plausible explanation for con-servativity's universality.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium
EditorsJulian J. Schlöder, Dean McHugh, Floris Roelofsen
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherUniversity of Amsterdam
Pages504-512
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventAmsterdam Colloquium 2019 - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 18-Dec-201920-Dec-2019

Conference

ConferenceAmsterdam Colloquium 2019
CountryNetherlands
CityAmsterdam
Period18/12/201920/12/2019

Event

Amsterdam Colloquium 2019

18/12/201920/12/2019

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Event: Conference

    Keywords

  • quantifiers, conservativity, acquisition, Quantification

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 120751171