Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without ProbabilitiesVerheij, B., 25-Jul-2019, In : Topics in Cognitive Science. 25 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
This paper is one in a series of rational analyses of the Dutch Simonshaven case, each using a different theoretical perspective. The theoretical perspectives discussed in the literature typically use arguments, scenarios, and probabilities, in various combinations. The theoretical perspective on evidential reasoning used in this paper has been designed to connect arguments, scenarios, and probabilities in a single formal modeling approach, in an attempt to investigate bridges between qualitative and quantitative analytic styles. The theoretical perspective uses the recently proposed logical formalism of case models, where cases represent possible combinations of evidence and events, ordered by an ordering relation. In the context of evidential reasoning, the ordering relation can be represented by a probability function. As an ordering relation is qualitative in nature, the theoretical perspective is in a formally precise sense simultaneously with and without probabilities.
|Number of pages||25|
|Journal||Topics in Cognitive Science|
|Publication status||Published - 25-Jul-2019|
- Evidential reasoning, Probabilistic models, Argumentation models, Narrative models, Case analysis, Rational proof, Criminal law, ARGUMENTS, SCENARIOS