Publication

A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year

Slot, W., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., Slater, J. J. H. & Meijer, H. J. A., Jan-2010, In : Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 37, 1, p. 98-110 13 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Slot, W., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., Slater, J. J. H., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2010). A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x

Author

Slot, Wim ; Raghoebar, Gerry M. ; Vissink, Arjan ; Slater, James J. Huddleston ; Meijer, Henny J. A. / A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 98-110.

Harvard

Slot, W, Raghoebar, GM, Vissink, A, Slater, JJH & Meijer, HJA 2010, 'A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year', Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x

Standard

A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. / Slot, Wim; Raghoebar, Gerry M.; Vissink, Arjan; Slater, James J. Huddleston; Meijer, Henny J. A.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 98-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Slater JJH, Meijer HJA. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2010 Jan;37(1):98-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x


BibTeX

@article{da0a648ea16948aab87e9f5989acca13,
title = "A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year",
abstract = "P>AimThe aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year.Material and methodsMEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles.ResultsOut of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year.ConclusionIn all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.",
keywords = "dental implants, edentulous, maxilla, overdentures, survival, systematic review, ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MAXILLA, SEVERELY RESORBED MAXILLAE, LASER-WELDED TITANIUM, RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES, 5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER, CONVENTIONAL CAST FRAMEWORKS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL, AUTOLOGOUS BONE-GRAFTS, FULL-ARCH PROSTHESIS, 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP",
author = "Wim Slot and Raghoebar, {Gerry M.} and Arjan Vissink and Slater, {James J. Huddleston} and Meijer, {Henny J. A.}",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "98--110",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year

AU - Slot, Wim

AU - Raghoebar, Gerry M.

AU - Vissink, Arjan

AU - Slater, James J. Huddleston

AU - Meijer, Henny J. A.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - P>AimThe aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year.Material and methodsMEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles.ResultsOut of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year.ConclusionIn all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.

AB - P>AimThe aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year.Material and methodsMEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles.ResultsOut of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year.ConclusionIn all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.

KW - dental implants

KW - edentulous

KW - maxilla

KW - overdentures

KW - survival

KW - systematic review

KW - ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MAXILLA

KW - SEVERELY RESORBED MAXILLAE

KW - LASER-WELDED TITANIUM

KW - RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES

KW - 5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER

KW - CONVENTIONAL CAST FRAMEWORKS

KW - RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL

KW - AUTOLOGOUS BONE-GRAFTS

KW - FULL-ARCH PROSTHESIS

KW - 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 37

SP - 98

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 5000624