Publication

A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study

Restemeyer, B., Woltjer, J. & van den Brink, M., Mar-2015, In : Planning Theory & Practice. 16, 1, p. 45-62 8 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Restemeyer, B., Woltjer, J., & van den Brink, M. (2015). A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950

Author

Restemeyer, Britta ; Woltjer, Johannes ; van den Brink, Margaretha. / A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities : a Hamburg case study. In: Planning Theory & Practice. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 45-62.

Harvard

Restemeyer, B, Woltjer, J & van den Brink, M 2015, 'A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study', Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950

Standard

A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities : a Hamburg case study. / Restemeyer, Britta; Woltjer, Johannes; van den Brink, Margaretha.

In: Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 45-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Restemeyer B, Woltjer J, van den Brink M. A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study. Planning Theory & Practice. 2015 Mar;16(1):45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950


BibTeX

@article{28275e202f8e4fb588546429d6618f3d,
title = "A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study",
abstract = "Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.",
keywords = "resilient cities, flood risk management; urban planning; resilience strategies",
author = "Britta Restemeyer and Johannes Woltjer and {van den Brink}, Margaretha",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "45--62",
journal = "Planning Theory & Practice",
issn = "1470-000X",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities

T2 - a Hamburg case study

AU - Restemeyer, Britta

AU - Woltjer, Johannes

AU - van den Brink, Margaretha

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.

AB - Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.

KW - resilient cities, flood risk management; urban planning; resilience strategies

U2 - 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950

DO - 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 45

EP - 62

JO - Planning Theory & Practice

JF - Planning Theory & Practice

SN - 1470-000X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 16838804