A short comment on the "Defence of Chalmers" by Hane Htut MaungKorf, J., Dec-2016, In : Dialogues in philosophy mental and neuro sciences. 9, 2, p. 69-69 1 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review
The last sentence of my article on the neurobiological context of qualia is: “Future neurobiological approaches might identify the neuronal processes involved in qualia and how they are involved, but it seems illusory to us [.. to me] to explain the individual quale”. Accordingly I do agree with Maung that the paper does not solve the “hard problem of Chalmers”. Instead, my article approaches it as a neurobiological problem, not as a philosophical issue.
|Number of pages||1|
|Journal||Dialogues in philosophy mental and neuro sciences|
|Publication status||Published - Dec-2016|