Publication

A morphologic and molecular reappraisal of myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue, bone, and viscera with EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements

Suurmeijer, A. J. H., Dickson, B. C., Swanson, D., Zhang, L., Sung, Y-S., Fletcher, C. D. & Antonescu, C. R., 7-Feb-2020, In : GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER. 9 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • A morphologic and molecular reappraisal of myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue, bone, and viscera with EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements

    Final publisher's version, 2.89 MB, PDF document

    Request copy

DOI

  • Albert J. H. Suurmeijer
  • Brendan C. Dickson
  • David Swanson
  • Lei Zhang
  • Yun-Shao Sung
  • Christopher D. Fletcher
  • Cristina R. Antonescu

Myoepithelial tumors (MET) represent a clinicopathologically heterogeneous group of tumors, ranging from benign to highly aggressive lesions. Although MET arising in soft tissue, bone, or viscera share morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with their salivary gland and cutaneous counterparts, there is still controversy regarding their genetic relationship. Half of MET of soft tissue and bone harbor EWSR1 or FUS related fusions, while MET arising in the salivary gland and skin often show PLAG1 and HMGA2 gene rearrangements. Regardless of the site of origin, the gold standard in diagnosing a MET relies on demonstrating its "myoepithelial immunophenotype" of positivity for EMA/CK and S100 protein or GFAP. However, the morphologic spectrum of MET in soft tissue and bone is quite broad and the above immunoprofile is nonspecific, being shared by other pathogenetically unrelated neoplasms. Moreover, rare MET lack a diagnostic immunoprofile but shows instead the characteristic gene fusions. In this study, we analyzed a large cohort of 66 MET with EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements spanning various clinical presentations, to better define their morphologic spectrum and establish relevant pathologic-molecular correlations. Genetic analysis was carried out by FISH for EWSR1/FUS rearrangements and potential partners, and/or by targeted RNA sequencing. Then, 82% showed EWSR1 rearrangement, while 18% had FUS abnormalities. EWSR1-POU5F1 occurred with predilection in malignant MET in children and young adults and these tumors had nested epithelioid morphology and clear cytoplasm. In contrast, EWSR1/FUS-PBX1/3 fusions were associated with benign and sclerotic spindle cell morphology. Tumors with EWSR1-KLF17 showed chordoma-like morphology. Our results demonstrate striking morphologic-molecular correlations in MET of bone, soft tissue and viscera, which might have implications in their clinical behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
JournalGENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Early online date28-Jan-2020
Publication statusPublished - 7-Feb-2020

    Keywords

  • EWSR1, FUS, myoepithelial tumors, PBX1, PBX3, CARCINOMA, FUSIONS, NEOPLASM, CHILDREN, MARKER, PLAG1

ID: 117205520