Theoretical Philosophy

University of Groningen > Faculty of Philosophy > Theoretical Philosophy

  1. 2013
  2. Novaes, C. D. (2013). The Adventure of Reason. Mind, 122(486), 571-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt034
  3. Douven, I., Decock, L., Dietz, R., & Egre, P. (2013). Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42(1), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9216-0
  4. Douven, I. (2013). Abduction and inference to the best explanation. In Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 3-5). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc..
  5. Romeijn, J. W., van den Heuvel, E. R., & Wit, E. C. (Eds.) (2013). "All Models are Wrong...". Statistica Neerlandica, 66(3).
  6. Krabbe, E. C. W. (2013). Arguments, Proofs, and Dialogues. In A. Aberdeen, & I. J. Dove (Eds.), The Argument of Mathematics (pp. 31-45). Dordrecht: Springer.
  7. Bewersdorf, B. (2013). Belief and Its Revision. Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System.
  8. van Laar, J. A. (2013). Commentary on: Cathal Woods' "The language and diagramming of rejection and objection". In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentaton: Proceedings of the 10th OSSA Conference at the University of Windsor, May 2013 (pp. 1-7)
  9. van Laar, J. A. (2013). Criticism in need of clarification. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th OSSA Conference at the University of Windsor, May 2013 (pp. 1-17). Windsor.
  10. Romeijn, J-W. (2013). De calculerende burger. In M. Geels, & T. van Opijnen (Eds.), Nederland in ideeën: 101 denkers over inzichten en innovaties die ons land verander(d)en (pp. 288-291). Amsterdam: Maven Publishing.
  11. Krabbe, E. C. W. (2013). De formalisering van kritische discussie. In R. Boogaart, & H. Jansen (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4 (pp. 233-243). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
  12. Bewersdorf, B., & Stroessner, C. (2013). Editorial. The Reasoner, 7(7), 79-80.
  13. Romeijn, J-W., Sterkenburg, T., & Grünwald , P. (2013). Good listeners, wise crowds, and parasitic experts. Analyse & Kritik, 34(2), 399-409.
  14. Kooi, B., & van Ditmarsch, H. (2013). Honderd gevangenen en een gloeilamp. (Epsilon uitgaven). Utrecht: Epsilon Uitgaven.
  15. Kuijer, B. (2013). How arbitrary are arbitrary public announcements? In ESSLLI Student Session 2013 Preproceedings (pp. 76-85). Springer.
  16. Maffezioli, P., Ciabattoni, A., & Spendier, L. (2013). Hypersequent and labelled calculi for intermediate logics. In D. Galmiche, & D. Larchey-Wendling (Eds.), Automated reasoning with analytic tableaux and related methods (pp. 81-96). (Lecture notes in computer science; Vol. 8123). Heidelberg: Springer.
  17. Douven, I., Krzyzanowska, K., & Wenmackers, S. (2013). Inferential conditionals and evidentiality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 22(3), 315-334.
  18. Bewersdorf, B., & Strößner, C. (2013). Interview with Wolfgang Spohn. The Reasoner, 7(7), 80-82.
  19. Wenmackers, S. (2013). Is wiskunde een taal? Eos: Maandblad over Wetenschap, 30(9), 58.
  20. Geurts, B., & Maier, E. (2013). Layered Discourse Representation Theory. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics (pp. 311-327). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_12
  21. Demey, L., Kooi, B., & Sack, J. (2013). Logic and probability. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Stanford University Press.
  22. Douven, I., Decock, L., & Dietz, R. (2013). Modelling comparative concepts in conceptual spaces. In Y. Motomura, A. Butler, & D. Bekki (Eds.), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. LNCS 7856, pp. 69-86). Berlin: Springer.
  23. Douven, I. (2013). Putting the pragmatics of belief to work. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 475-488). Berlin: Springer.
  24. Douven, I. (2013). Qualia change and colour science. In V. Karakostas, & D. Dieks (Eds.), EPSA 11 : Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science (Vol. 2, pp. 417-428). Berlin: Springer.
  25. Kuijer, B. (2013). Sequent systems for nondeterministic propositional logics without reflexivity. In D. Grossi, O. Roy, & H. Huang (Eds.), Logic, Rationality and Interaction: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction (LORI-IV), LNCS 8196 (pp. 190-203). Springer.
  26. Krabbe, E. C. W. (2013). Strategic Maneuvering in Mathematical Proofs. In A. Aberdeen, & I. J. Dove (Eds.), The Argument of Mathematics (pp. 181-197). Dordrecht: Springer.
  27. Maffezioli, P., Naibo, A., & Negri, S. (2013). The Church-Fitch paradox in the light of structural proof theory. Synthese, 190(14), 2677-2716.
  28. Duncombe, M. (2013). The end of Socrates and the beginning of platonism. Qualia, 2(1), 19-20.
  29. Douven, I. (2013). The epistemology of de se beliefs. In Attitudes De Se: Linguistics, epistemology, metaphysics (pp. 273-289). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  30. Douven, I. (2013). The lottery and preface paradoxes: Philosophy, . In D. Pritchard (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies Online: Philosophy Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2013). The Ockham-Burley dispute. In A. Conti (Ed.), A Companion to Walter Burley (pp. 49-86). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff/Brill.
  32. Wenmackers, S. (2013). Wetenschap maakt macht. Eos: Maandblad over Wetenschap, 30(6), 56.
  33. Romeijn, J-W., Pacuit, E., & Pedersen, A. P. (2013). When is an example a counterexample? In B. C. Schipper (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge : TARK 2013 (pp. 156-165). New York: ACM Press.
  34. 2012
Previous 1...3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...16 Next

ID: 9480