Theoretical Philosophy

University of Groningen > Faculty of Philosophy > Theoretical Philosophy

  1. 2016
  2. Meier, C., & van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J. (Eds.) (2016). Subjective Meaning: Alternatives to Relativism. (Linguistische Arbeiten). De Gruyter Mouton.
  3. van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J. (2016). Subjective meaning: an introduction. In J. van Wijbergen-Huitink, & C. Meier (Eds.), Subjective Meaning: Alternatives to Relativism (pp. 1-19). (Linguistische Arbeiten). De Gruyter Mouton.
  4. Maier, E. (2016). Why my I is your you: On the communication of de se attitudes. In M. García-Carpintero, & S. Torre (Eds.), About Oneself: De Se Thought and Communication (pp. 220-245). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713265.003.0009
  5. van Laar, J. (2016). Commentary on Douglas Walton, Alice Toniolo and Timothy J. Norman’s paper “Speech acts and burden of proof in computational models of deliberation dialogue”. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 777-780). College Publications.
  6. van Laar, J. A. (2016). Commentary on Ralph H. Johnson’s “On Distinguishing Between an Objection and a Criticism”. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-4). OSSA.
  7. Roy, O., Tamminga, A., & Willer, M. (Eds.) (2016). Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: 13th International Conference, DEON 2016. London: College Publications.
  8. Geurts, B., Beaver, D., & Maier, E. (2016). Discourse Representation Theory. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: (Spring 2016 Edition) Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University.
  9. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Eerlijke en oneerlijke strategieën in maatschappelijke discussies. In D. Van De Mierop, L. Buysse, R. Coesemans, & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 131-143). Leuven (Louvain)/ The Hague: Uitgeverij Acco.
  10. Peeters, J., & Romeijn, J-W. (2016). Epistemic considerations about uncertainty and model selection in computational archaeology: A case study on exploratory modeling. In M. Brouwer Burg, H. Peeters, & W. Lovis (Eds.), Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Archaeological Computational Modeling (pp. 37-58). (Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27833-9_3
  11. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies: The Case of Induced Earthquakes. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 343-362). (Studies in Logic ; Vol. 62). London: College Publications.
  12. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2016). Five questions in the philosophy of logic. In T. Lupher, & T. Adajian (Eds.), Philosophy of Logic: 5 Questions Automatic Press/VIP.
  13. Dutilh Novaes, C., & Uckelman, S. (2016). Obligationes. In C. Dutilh Novaes, & S. Read (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic (pp. 370-395). (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449862.016
  14. Romeijn, J. (2016). Preface. In Logic of Statistical Inference (2 ed.). (Cambridge Philosophy Classics). Cambridge University Press.
  15. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Reply to David Godden’s Commentary on “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-3). OSSA.
  16. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Splitting a Difference of Opinion. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-19). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
  17. Bewersdorf, B. (2016). Total Evidence, Uncertainty and A Priori Beliefs. In L. Felline, A. Ledda, F. Paoli, & E. Rossanese (Eds.), New Directions in Logic and the Philosophy of Science (pp. 57-66). (The SILFS series ; Vol. 3). College Publications.
  18. van Ditmarsch, H., Kooi, B., Elancheziyan, & Kawabe, H., (TRANS.) (2016). 100人の囚人と1個の電球. 日本評論社.
  19. 2015
  20. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2015). That’s No Argument! The Ultimate Criticism? In B. J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 793-804). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
  21. van Wijnbergen-Huitink, J., Elqayam, S., & Over, D. E. (2015). The probability of iterated conditionals. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 788-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12169
  22. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2015). Conceptual genealogy for analytic philosophy. In J. A. Bell, A. Culrofello, & P. M. Livingston (Eds.), Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 75-110). Routledge.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...16 Next

ID: 9480