Theoretical Philosophy

University of Groningen > Faculty of Philosophy > Theoretical Philosophy

  1. 2019
  2. Maier, E., & Bimpikou, S. (2019). Shifting perspectives in pictorial narratives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23 (pp. 1-15). Barcelona.
  3. O'Connord, C., Bright, L. K., & Bruner, J. P. (2019). The Emergence of Intersectional Disadvantage. Social Epistemology, 33(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2018.1555870
  4. Proietti, C., Grossi, D., Smets, S., & Velázquez-Quesada, F. R. (2019). Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks, Modal Logic and Semantic Paradoxes. In P. Blackburn, E. Lorini, & M. Guo (Eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction - 7th International Workshop, LORI 2019, Proceedings (pp. 214-229). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 11813 LNCS). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60292-8_16
  5. Ozyildiz, D., Major, T., & Maier, E. (2019). Communicative reception reports as hear-say: Evidence from indexical shift in Turkish. In Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 296-305). Cascadilla Press.
  6. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2019). Introduction: Dans le bourbier des arguties. In M-N. Doutreix, C. Jeandot, L. Petters, & L. Soryano (Eds.), Pinailler: Entre souci de précision et bavardage (pp. 1-28). (Les Cahiers; No. 23-24). Lyon: Sens Public.
  7. van Laar, J. A. (2019). Middle Ground: Settling a public controversy by means of a reasonable compromise. In J. A. Blair (Ed.), Studies in Critical Thinking (pp. 69-80). (Windsor Studies in Argumentation; Vol. 8). Windsor: Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric.
  8. Laar, van, J. A. (Author). (2019). Middle Ground. Software, University of Groningen. Retrieved from https://middleground.nl/
  9. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2019). Pressure and argumentation in Public Controversies. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & J. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 702-709). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
  10. Geerdink, L. M. (2019). Progress in philosophy: a defense of Philosophical Skepticism. [Groningen]: University of Groningen.
  11. 2018
  12. de Vos, M., Kooi, B., & Verbrugge, R. (2018). Provability logic meets the knower paradox. In G. D’Agostino, & G. Bezhanishvilii (Eds.), Advances in Modal Logic 2018: Accepted Short Papers (pp. 31-35). Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  13. Szymanik, J., & Verbrugge, R. (2018). Tractability and the computational mind. In M. Sprevak, & M. Colombo (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Computational Mind (1st Editon ed., pp. 339-353). Oxford: Routledge.
  14. Keijzer, F. (2018). Beyond brain-body dualism: Neural signaling inside and outside the brain. In D. S. Adams, & M. Levin (Eds.), Ahead of the Curve, Vol. 2: Hidden breakthroughs in the biosciences IoP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-1677-4ch6
  15. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2018). Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 2, pp. 887-907). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 77). College Publications.
  16. Henderson, L. (2018). Global versus local arguments for scientific realism. In J. Saatsi (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism (Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy). Routledge.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...16 Next

ID: 9480