Other personnel

University of Groningen > Faculty of Philosophy > Other personnel

  1. 2020
  2. van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2020). Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory (pp. 1-51). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3_11-2
  3. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2020). Be reasonable! Ways to react to cases of presumed unreason. In C. Dutilh Novaes, H. Jansen, J. A. van Laar, & B. Verheij (Eds.), Reason to Dissent: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 3, pp. 49-62). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 87). United Kingdom: College Publications.
  4. Peijnenburg, J. (2020). Een goed leven? Retrocausaliteit en het tweede persoonsperspectief. In H. Dooremalen (Ed.), Hier ben ik: Liber amicorum voor Monica Meijsing (pp. 51-69). Tilburg: Brave New Books.
  5. van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2020). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3
  6. Peijnenburg, J., & Atkinson, D. (2020). "The worst ever conceived by a man of genius": Hume's probability argument in A Treatise. In C. Dutilh Novaes, H. Jansen, J. A. van Laar, & B. Verheij (Eds.), Reason to Dissent: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 3, pp. 225-238). (Studies in Logic and Argumentation ; Vol. 87). College Publications.
  7. 2019
  8. Ravi, V., Catha, M., D'Addario, L., Djorgovski, S. G., Hallinan, G., Hobbs, R., ... Woody, D. P. (2019). A fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy. Nature, 572, 352-354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1389-7
  9. Peijnenburg, J., & Ostertag, G. (2019). Denomination/Determination in Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones (1848-1922). In M. E. Waithe, & R. Hagengruber (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers Paderborn University.
  10. Peijnenburg, J., & Atkinson, D. (2019). Finite Minds and Open Minds. In B. Fitelson (Ed.), Theme from Klein: Knowledge, Scepticism, Justification (Synthese Library ed., Vol. 404, pp. 189-196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04522-7_12
  11. Peijnenburg, J., & Ostertag, G. (2019). Identity/Nonidentity in Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones (1848-1922). In M. E. Waithe, & R. Hagengruber (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers Paderborn University.
  12. Peijnenburg, J., & Ostertag, G. (2019). Intension/Extension in Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones (1848-1922). In M. E. Waithe, & R. Hagengruber (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers Paderborn University.
  13. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2019). Introduction: Dans le bourbier des arguties. In M-N. Doutreix, C. Jeandot, L. Petters, & L. Soryano (Eds.), Pinailler: Entre souci de précision et bavardage (pp. 1-28). (Les Cahiers; No. 23-24). Lyon: Sens Public.
  14. Peijnenburg, J., & Ostertag, G. (2019). Law of Significant Assertion in Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones (1848-1922). In M. E. Waithe, & R. Hagengruber (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers Paderborn University.
  15. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2019). Pressure and argumentation in Public Controversies. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & J. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 702-709). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
  16. 2018
  17. Krabbe, E. C. W. (2018). Commentary on Jacobs’s On How to Do Without the Opening Stage: Arguers and Argumentation Theorists Can Get Along Without It. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 (Vol. 1, pp. 279-282). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 76). College Publications.
  18. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2018). Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 2, pp. 887-907). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 77). College Publications.
  19. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2018). In the Quagmire of Quibbles. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumenation (Vol. 1, pp. 283-303). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 76). College Publications.
  20. Aristotle, Hasper, P. S., (TRANS.), & Krabbe, E. C. W., (TRANS.) (2018). Over Drogredenen. (Aristoteles in Nederlanse vertaling). Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.
  21. 2017
  22. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2017). Argumentación y normatividad dialógica: Compromisos y razionamiento interpersonal. (Derecho & Argumentación; Vol. 9). Lima, Peru: Pálestra Editores.
  23. Kuipers, T. (2017). Quantitative nomic truth approximation by revising models and postulates. In M. Massimi, J-W. Romeijn, & G. Schurz (Eds.), EPSA15 Selected papers: The 5th conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association in Düsseldorf (pp. 309-320). (European Studies in Philosophy of Science; Vol. 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53730-6_25
  24. 2016
  25. Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Commentary on: Michel Dufour's "On the Difference Between Fallacy and Sophism". In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1-4). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
  26. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Eerlijke en oneerlijke strategieën in maatschappelijke discussies. In D. Van De Mierop, L. Buysse, R. Coesemans, & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 131-143). Leuven (Louvain)/ The Hague: Uitgeverij Acco.
  27. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies: The Case of Induced Earthquakes. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 343-362). (Studies in Logic ; Vol. 62). London: College Publications.
  28. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Reply to David Godden’s Commentary on “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-3). OSSA.
  29. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Splitting a Difference of Opinion. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-19). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
Previous 1 2 3 Next

ID: 9522