Faculty of Philosophy

University of Groningen > Faculty of Philosophy

  1. 2020
  2. Kleingeld, P. (Ed.), Vermeulen, C., (TRANS.), & Achenwall, G. (Ed.) (2020). Prolegomena to Natural Law. Groningen: University of Groningen Press. https://doi.org/10.21827/5cdabd4c2a027
  3. Sangiacomo, A. (2020). La muse bien tempérée: Mécanisme affectif et narration chez Spinoza. In P-F. Moreau , & L. Vinciguerra (Eds.), Spinoza et les arts (pp. 90-106). L'Harmattan.
  4. Maier, E. (2020, Jan 13). Making up stuff.
  5. Pauly, M. (2020). Conspiracy Theories. In J. Fieser, & B. Dowden (Eds.), The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
  6. Eva Odzuck, & Chadwick, A. (Accepted/In press). Hobbes and Feminism Special Issue. Hobbes Studies, 33(1).
  7. 2019
  8. Stahl, T. (2019). Normativity and Totality: Lukács’ Contribution to a Critical Social Ontology. In M. J. Thompson (Ed.), Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology (pp. 366-391). (Studies in Critical Social Sciences; Vol. 148). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415522_014
  9. Maier, E. (2019). Picturing words: The semantics of speech balloons. In Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 584-592). Amsterdam.
  10. Lenz, M. (2019). Relativism in Early Modern Philosophy. In M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Relativism Routledge.
  11. Knowles, C. (2019). Relativism in Feminist Political Theory. In M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism Routledge.
  12. Herzog, L. M. (2019). Gestörte Philosophie, störende Philosophie: Populismus, Philosophie, und die Reflexivität der Störung. In Quertreiber des Denkens: Dieter Thomä- Werk und Wirkung (pp. 133-142). Transcript.
  13. David Santos, Y. (Accepted/In press). Social Consolidations: Rational Belief in a Many-Valued Logic of Evidence and Peerhood. In 11th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer.
  14. Stahl, T. (2019). Political Hope and Cooperative Community. In C. Blöser, & T. Stahl (Eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope (pp. 265-284). (Moral Psychology of the Emotions). Rowman and Littlefield International.
  15. Blöser, C., & Stahl, T. (Eds.) (2019). The Moral Psychology of Hope. (Moral Psychology of the Emotions). London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
  16. Blöser, C., & Stahl, T. (2019). The Moral Psychology of Hope: An Introduction. In C. Blöser, & T. Stahl (Eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope (pp. 1-12). (Moral Psychology of the Emotions). London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
  17. Schmidt, A., & Savic, L. (2019). The Ethics of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Population-Level Perspective. In M. Trachsel, S. Tekin, N. Biller-Adorno, J. Gaab, & J. Sadler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychotherapy Ethics Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.013.7
  18. Stahl, T. (2019). Privatheitsrechte und politische Öffentlichkeit. In H. Behrendt, W. Loh, T. Matzner, & C. Misselhorn (Eds.), Privatsphäre 4.0: Eine Neuverortung des Privaten im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung (pp. 123-143). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04860-8_8
  19. Evers, D. (2019). Aesthetic properties, mind-independence, and companions in guilt. In C. Cowie, & R. Rowland (Eds.), Companions in Guilt Arguments in Metaethics London: Routledge.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...65 Next

ID: 8054