Ethics,Social and Political Philosophy

University of Groningen > Faculty of Philosophy > Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy

  1. 2020
  2. Stahl, T. (2020). Crítica inmanente y experiencia moral particular. In J. M. Romero, & J. A. Zamora (Eds.), Crítica inmanente de la sociedad (pp. 19-49). (Pensamiento crítico/pensamiento utópico; Vol. 236). Barcelona: Anthropos.
  3. Achenwall, G., Kleingeld, P. (Ed.), & Vermeulen, C., (TRANS.) (2020). Prolegomena to Natural Law. Groningen: University of Groningen Press.
  4. Kleingeld, P. (Accepted/In press). A Kantian Solution to the Trolley Problem. In M. Timmons (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics (Vol. 10). Oxford University Press.
  5. Pauly, M. (2020). Conspiracy Theories. In J. Fieser, & B. Dowden (Eds.), The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
  6. 2019
  7. Stahl, T. (2019). Normativity and Totality: Lukács’ Contribution to a Critical Social Ontology. In M. J. Thompson (Ed.), Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology (pp. 366-391). (Studies in Critical Social Sciences; Vol. 148). Brill.
  8. Knowles, C. (2019). Relativism in Feminist Political Theory. In M. Kusch (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism Routledge.
  9. Herzog, L. M. (2019). Gestörte Philosophie, störende Philosophie: Populismus, Philosophie, und die Reflexivität der Störung. In Quertreiber des Denkens: Dieter Thomä- Werk und Wirkung (pp. 133-142). Transcript.
  10. Stahl, T. (2019). Political Hope and Cooperative Community. In C. Blöser, & T. Stahl (Eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope (pp. 265-284). (Moral Psychology of the Emotions). Rowman and Littlefield International.
  11. Blöser, C., & Stahl, T. (Eds.) (2019). The Moral Psychology of Hope. (Moral Psychology of the Emotions). London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
  12. Blöser, C., & Stahl, T. (2019). The Moral Psychology of Hope: An Introduction. In C. Blöser, & T. Stahl (Eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope (pp. 1-12). (Moral Psychology of the Emotions). London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
  13. Schmidt, A., & Savic, L. (2019). The Ethics of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Population-Level Perspective. In M. Trachsel, S. Tekin, N. Biller-Adorno, J. Gaab, & J. Sadler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychotherapy Ethics Oxford University Press.
  14. Stahl, T. (2019). Privatheitsrechte und politische Öffentlichkeit. In H. Behrendt, W. Loh, T. Matzner, & C. Misselhorn (Eds.), Privatsphäre 4.0: Eine Neuverortung des Privaten im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung (pp. 123-143). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler Verlag.
  15. Evers, D. (2019). Aesthetic properties, mind-independence, and companions in guilt. In C. Cowie, & R. Rowland (Eds.), Companions in Guilt Arguments in Metaethics London: Routledge.
  16. EUCLIDS Consortium, Borghini, L., Png, E., Binder, A., Wright, V. J., Pinnock, E., ... Davila, S. (2019). Identification of regulatory variants associated with genetic susceptibility to meningococcal disease. Scientific Reports, 9, [6966].
  17. Herzog, L. (2019). Die Rettung der Arbeit: ein politischer Aufruf. (1. Auflage. ed.) Hanser Berlin.
  18. de Bruin, B., & Endörfer, R. (2019). Freedom in Finance: The Importance of Epistemic Virtues and Interlucent Communication. In C. Cowton, J. Dempsey, & T. Sorell (Eds.), Business Ethics after the Global Financial Crisis: Lessons from the Crash (pp. 104-130). (Routledge Studies in Business Ethics). New York: Routledge.
  19. Stahl, T. (2019). Immanent Critique. In A. Allen, & E. Mendieta (Eds.), The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon (pp. 191-193). Cambridge University Press.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...14 Next

ID: 9451