Publication

Coordination dynamics in crew rowing

Cuijpers, L. S., 2019, [Groningen]: University of Groningen. 182 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)Academic

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 148 KB, PDF-document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 198 KB, PDF-document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 520 KB, PDF-document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 688 KB, PDF-document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 976 KB, PDF-document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 573 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 14/01/2021

    Request copy

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 422 KB, PDF-document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 620 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 09/09/2020

    Request copy

  • Chapter 8

    Final publisher's version, 255 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 09/09/2020

    Request copy

  • Appendices

    Final publisher's version, 993 KB, PDF-document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 3 MB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 14/01/2021

    Request copy

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 21 KB, PDF-document

DOI

Crew rowing is often quoted as an archetypical example of team behaviour, synchronisation processes and joint action. Although traditionally rowers strive to move in perfect unison, it has been suggested that rowing in antiphase coordination might prove to be more mechanically efficient and thus faster. Theoretically, by alternating their strokes rowers would reduce velocity fluctuations of the boat, which would potentially result in faster racing times. The current dissertation investigates movement coordination of the crew in both in- and antiphase coordination and the effects thereof on the movements of the boat. Experiments were performed in the lab using ergometers that were connected through slides (as to mimic one ‘boat’ moving with respect to the water) and on the water using a custom-made measurement system. Although the antiphase pattern is less stable than the (well trained) in-phase pattern, the results show that rowers are well able to row together in antiphase, even when trying for the very first time. Interestingly, both coordination patterns proved to be more stable at the higher compared to the lower movement frequency. Moreover, rowing in antiphase indeed reduces velocity fluctuations of the boat.
Although rowing in antiphase did not result in faster racing times yet, the results provide a promising first indication of the potential benefits of antiphase rowing.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
Supervisors/Advisors
Award date9-Sep-2019
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Publisher
Print ISBNs978-94-034-1851-3
Electronic ISBNs978-94-034-1850-6
Publication statusPublished - 2019

View graph of relations

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 94906482