University of Groningenfounded in 1614  -  top 100 university
Close
ResearchResearch database

Social Cognition, 0278-016X

Journal

1 - 13 out of 13Page size: 50
  1. 2017
  2. Leander, N. P., Kay, A. C., Chartrand, T. L., & Payne, B. K. (2017). An affect misattribution pathway to perceptions of intrinsic reward. Social Cognition, 35(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.2.163
  3. 2016
  4. Peetz, J., & Epstude, K. (2016). Calendars Matter: Temporal Categories Affect Cognition about Future Time Periods . Social Cognition, 34(4), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.4.1
  5. 2014
  6. Greijdanus, H., Postmes, T., Gordijn, E. H., & van Zomeren, M. (2014). When abstraction does not increase stereotyping: Preparing for intragroup communication enables abstract construal of stereotype-inconsistent information. Social Cognition, 32(6), 505-527. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.6.505
  7. 2013
  8. Leander, N. P., & Shah, J. Y. (2013). For whom the goals loom: Context-driven goal contagion. Social Cognition, 31(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.187
  9. 2011
  10. Koudenburg, N., & Gordijn, E. H. (2011). My date can call me sweet but my colleague can't: Meta-stereotypic behavior as a function of context and liking of the outgroup. Social Cognition, 29(2), 221-230.
  11. 2010
  12. Bongers, K. C. A., Dijksterhuis, A., & Spears, R. (2010). ON THE ROLE OF CONSCIOUSNESS IN GOAL PURSUIT. Social Cognition, 28(2), 262-272.
  13. Gordijn, E. H. (2010). When thinking that you are fat makes you feel worthless: Activation and application of meta-stereotypes when appearance matters. Social Cognition, 28(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.20
  14. 2006
  15. Schwinghammer, S. A., & Stapel, D. A. (2006). The Effects of Different Types of Self-activation on Social Comparison Orientation. Social Cognition, 24, 703 - 722. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.6.703
  16. Marx, D. M., & Stapel, D. A. (2006). Understanding stereotype lift: The role of the social self. Social Cognition, 24, 776 - 792. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.6.776
  17. 2005
  18. Stapel, DA., & Koomen, W. (2005). Multiple ambiguity and an impression formation focus make inapplicable primes useful. Social Cognition, 23(4), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2005.23.4.324
  19. 2004
  20. Stapel, D. A., & Schwinghammer, S. A. (2004). Defensive social comparisons and the constraints of reality. Social Cognition, 22(1), 147 - 167. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.1.147.30989
  21. 1996
  22. Martijn, C., van der Pligt, J., & Spears, R. (1996). Self-serving bias in attitude judgments: The use of person versus issue implicated language. Social Cognition, 14(1), 77-91.
  23. 1994
  24. STAPEL, DA., REICHER, SD., & SPEARS, R. (1994). SOCIAL IDENTITY, AVAILABILITY AND THE PERCEPTION OF RISK. Social Cognition, 12(1), 1-17.

ID: 523921

University of Groningen staff: edit these data

print
Follow the UGfacebook twitter linkedin rss instagram youtube