1. Coherence and Probability in Legal Evidence

   Dahlman, C. & Mackor, A-R., Dec-2019, In : Law, Probability & Risk. 18, 4, p. 275–294 20 p.

   Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

2. Arguments, scenarios and probabilities; connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning

   Verheij, B., Bex, F., Timmer, S. T., Vlek, C., Meyer, J. J. C., Renooij, S. & Prakken, H., 2016, In : Law, Probability & Risk. 15, 1, p. 35-70

   Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

3. On direct and indirect probabilistic reasoning in legal proof

   Prakken, H., 2014, In : Law, Probability & Risk. 13, 3-4, p. 327-337 11 p.

   Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

4. To Catch a Thief With and Without Numbers: Arguments, Scenarios and Probabilities in Evidential Reasoning.

   Verheij, B., 2014, In : Law, Probability & Risk. 13, p. 307-325 19 p.

   Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

5. Argumentation Support Software: Boxes-and-Arrows and Beyond.

   Verheij, B., 2007, In : Law, Probability & Risk. 6, p. 187 - 208

   Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

View all (6) »