Students with (suspicion of) IG+ASD: A study aimed at understanding the phenomenon of Intellectual Giftedness in co-occurrence with Autism Spectrum Disorder in relation to (needs-based) assessment

Veltmeijer, A. E. J., 2016, [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 167 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)

Copy link to clipboard


  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 435 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 453 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 863 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 952 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 600 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 667 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 507 KB, PDF document

  • References

    Final publisher's version, 573 KB, PDF document

  • Summary

    Final publisher's version, 460 KB, PDF document

  • Samenvatting

    Final publisher's version, 459 KB, PDF document

  • Appendices

    Final publisher's version, 1.01 MB, PDF document

  • Dankwoord

    Final publisher's version, 428 KB, PDF document

  • Curriculum Vitae

    Final publisher's version, 423 KB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 2.32 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 122 KB, PDF document

  • Agnes Elisabeth Johanna Veltmeijer
The phenomenon ‘Intellectual Giftedness in co-occurrence with Autism Spectrum Disorder’ (IG+ASD) was explored in relation to psycho-educational assessment praxis. A systematic literature review revealed the absence of well-grounded theories of IG+ASD, and some converging tendencies concerning personal characteristics of IG+ASD. Meanwhile, diagnosticians in education and mental health organisations faced the problem of misdiagnoses and missed diagnoses. Therefore, the S&W Heuristic was developed: A ‘rule of thumb’ which deals with the discrepancy between the lack of a theoretically coherent view on assessments and the concomitant problem of biased diagnoses in psycho-educational practices. The S&W Heuristic systematically connects assessment data and intervention indications. It does not primarily aim at categorical diagnoses, such as the labels IG, ASD or IG+ASD. Instead it aims at the question ‘which interventions fit this student with (suspicion of) IG+ASD’, by means of revealing the individual student’s Special Psycho-Educational Needs (SPENs). Subsequently, two empirical studies focused on how assessment processes were performed in various psycho-educational practices in the Netherlands: Whether they were consistent with the theoretical principles of the S&W Heuristic, and whether there seemed to be any necessity of optimisation of assessment trajectories in psycho-educational practice. A total of 36 assessment dossiers of students (full-scale IQ ≥ 130) were analysed. The results indicate that bias as well as unsystematicity were present in different stages of a substantial part of these assessments. It was concluded that the S&W Heuristic seems to pave the way for systematicity and less bias in assessment processes of students with (suspicion of) IG+ASD.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Minnaert, Alexander, Supervisor
  • van den Bosch, Elsje, Co-supervisor
  • Grietens, Hans, Assessment committee
  • Lindsay, G. (Geoff), Assessment committee, External person
  • Van der Gaag, R.J., Assessment committee, External person
Award date17-Mar-2016
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Print ISBNs978-94-6233-218-8
Electronic ISBNs978-94-6233-224-9
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 28791215