Publication

Sepsis patients in the emergency department: Stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?

Quinten, V. M., van Meurs, M., Wolffensperger, A. E., ter Maaten, J. C. & Ligtenberg, J. J. M. Oct-2018 In : European journal of emergency medicine. 25, 5, p. 328-334 7 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the stratification of sepsis patients in the emergency department (ED) for ICU admission and mortality using the Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction (PIRO) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores with clinical judgement assessed by the ED staff.Patients and methodsThis was a prospective observational study in the ED of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Adult nontrauma patients with suspected infection and at least two Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria were included. The primary outcome was direct ED to ICU admission. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital, 28-day and 6-month mortality, indirect ICU admission and length of stay. Clinical judgement was recorded using the Clinical Impression Scores (CIS), appraised by a nurse and the attending physician. The PIRO and qSOFA scores were calculated from medical records.ResultsWe included 193 patients: 103 presented with sepsis, 81 with severe sepsis and nine with septic shock. Fifteen patients required direct ICU admission. The CIS scores of nurse [area under the curve (AUC)=0.896] and the attending physician (AUC=0.861), in conjunction with PIRO (AUC=0.876) and qSOFA scores (AUC=0.849), predicted direct ICU admission. The CIS scores did not predict any of the mortality endpoints. The PIRO score predicted in-hospital (AUC=0.764), 28-day (AUC=0.784) and 6-month mortality (AUC=0.695). The qSOFA score also predicted in-hospital (AUC=0.823), 28-day (AUC=0.848) and 6-month mortality (AUC=0.620).ConclusionClinical judgement is a fast and reliable method to stratify between ICU and general ward admission in ED patients with sepsis. The PIRO and qSOFA scores do not add value to this stratification, but perform better on the prediction of mortality. In sepsis patients, therefore, the principle of treat first what kills first' can be supplemented with judge first and calculate later'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)328-334
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean journal of emergency medicine
Volume25
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct-2018

    Keywords

  • Clinical Impression Score, emergency department, ICU admission, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, risk assessment, sepsis, SEPTIC SHOCK, MORTALITY, PERFORMANCE, RISK, CARE

View graph of relations

ID: 65809130