Publication

Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation Compared to Systemic Chemotherapy and to Partial Hepatectomy in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meijerink, M. R., Puijk, R. S., van Tilborg, A. A. J. M., Henningsen, K. H., Fernandez, L. G., Neyt, M., Heymans, J., Frankema, J. S., de Jong, K. P., Richel, D. J., Prevoo, W. & Vlayen, J. Aug-2018 In : Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 41, 8, p. 1189-1204 16 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  • Martijn R. Meijerink
  • Robbert S. Puijk
  • Aukje A. J. M. van Tilborg
  • Kirsten Holdt Henningsen
  • Llenalia Garcia Fernandez
  • Mattias Neyt
  • Juanita Heymans
  • Jacqueline S. Frankema
  • Koert P. de Jong
  • Dick J. Richel
  • Warner Prevoo
  • Joan Vlayen

To assess safety and outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as compared to systemic chemotherapy and partial hepatectomy (PH) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies with multivariate analysis and/or matching were included. Guidelines from National Guideline Clearinghouse and Guidelines International Network were assessed using the AGREE II instrument.

The search revealed 3530 records; 328 were selected for full-text review; 48 were included: 8 systematic reviews, 2 randomized studies, 26 comparative observational studies, 2 guideline-articles and 10 case series; in addition 13 guidelines were evaluated. Literature to assess the effectiveness of ablation was limited. RFA + systemic chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone. PH was superior to RFA alone but not to RFA + PH or to MWA. Compared to PH, RFA showed fewer complications, MWA did not. Outcomes were subject to residual confounding since ablation was only employed for unresectable disease.

The results from the EORTC-CLOCC trial, the comparable survival for ablation + PH versus PH alone, the potential to induce long-term disease control and the low complication rate argue in favour of ablation over chemotherapy alone. Further randomized comparisons of ablation to current-day chemotherapy alone should therefore be considered unethical. Hence, the highest achievable level of evidence for unresectable CRLM seems reached. The apparent selection bias from previous studies and the superior safety profile mandate the setup of randomized controlled trials comparing ablation to surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1189-1204
Number of pages16
JournalCardiovascular and interventional radiology
Volume41
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug-2018

    Keywords

  • Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Microwave ablation (MWA), Partial hepatectomy (PH), Systemic chemotherapy, LONG-TERM OUTCOMES, CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES, HEPATIC RESECTION, 1ST-LINE TREATMENT, THERMAL ABLATION, COAGULATION THERAPY, PRACTICE PARAMETERS, CANCER METASTASES, FOLLOW-UP, RECURRENCE

View graph of relations

ID: 62715537