The Ethics Committee of the Department of Sociology (ECS) provides ethical review for research projects conducted or supervised by department members, and/or involving Sociology students.
The ECS consists of seven fixed staff members. Additionally, two PhD students participate in the ECS activities as advisors. Here follows the composition of the committee:
|Dijkstra, dr J.||Associate Professor|
|Duijn, dr M.A.J. van||Associate Professor||Chairperson|
|Giardini, F., PhD||Assistant professor|
|Huitsing, dr G.E.||Assistant Professor|
|Krause, R.W., MSc||PhD Student|
|Liu, J.||PhD candidate|
|Maes, dr M.||Assistant Professor|
|Ploeg, dr R. van der||Assistant professor||secretary|
|Roos, M., MSc||Lecturer|
The ECS follows two distinct review procedures: the general procedure for ethical review, and the procedure for the review of Testdays study proposals.
General procedure for ethical review
Upon request of the researcher(s), the ECS reviews research proposals conducted or supervised by members of the Sociology department. The flowchart below illustrates the decision process of the ECS, and how it comes to (conditionally) approve or reject a proposal.
Further below you can find information on how to submit a research proposal, how to structure your submission and how to apply for the quick procedure.
Finally, in the section “Guidelines” you can find a list of codes of ethics on which the ECS bases its decisions.
How to submit a research proposal
Research proposals are to be submitted via email to email@example.com .
To ensure impartiality of treatment and to allow researchers to incorporate the feedback, the ECS only reviews study proposals if the time between the submission of the proposal and the scheduled start of data collection allows at least one round of review. One round of review takes approximately one month, and the evaluation of a proposal usually takes 2 or 3 rounds.
Usually, the ECS meets every last Tuesday of the month. At this address ( https://sites.google.com/a/rug.nl/ecs/ ) you can find the date of the next scheduled meeting of the ECS. If your submission is received 6 or more working days before the ECS meeting, it will be discussed during the meeting; otherwise, the ECS will plan a meeting to discuss the proposal for the following weeks.
Upon reception of the submission, the ECS will archive the research proposal on University servers (specifically in encrypted folders on the Y:\ drive) for future reference. All comments and decisions issued by the ECS, as well as all updated versions of the proposal and its attachments will be archived, too. Only the ECS chair and secretary will have access to the archive.
Following a positive evaluation by the ECS, and after the completion of the data collection, the ECS warmly invites you to send some feedback about problems, strength or improvement points that emerged during the review process and the data collection. You can send your feedback to firstname.lastname@example.org – it will be valuable for improving our procedures and better informing researchers who will submit new proposals in the future.
Structure of a research proposal
A research proposal submitted for ethical review contains
A research protocol including
- Name(s) of researcher and team members/supervisor(s)
- Outline of research question and study design
- Research population
- Questionnaire(s) and/or other research materials (e.g. vignettes, (computer) tests)
- If applicable - expected dates for data collection
- If the proposal is the continuation or variation of an older one, or if part of the questionnaire has already been approved by an Ethics Committee, please provide the relevant details
Participant information including
- Information letter about proposed research, confidentiality issues and data storage/management, voluntary participation, feedback of results
- Informed consent form
Research data management issues including
- Method of storing digital and physical data, duration of storage,
- Anonymity, data sharing, and other privacy issues
This procedure allows a quick evaluation (within 10 working days) of study proposals which satisfy certain conditions.
The quick procedure only applies to study proposals which have a large resemblance to a study proposal already approved by the ECS. Typical examples for study proposals eligible for the quick procedure are replication studies, or studies where the questionnaire includes a couple more items compared to the original study, or with small text changes.
To apply for the quick procedure, follow the submission rules for the general procedure (see above), and mention in the email that the proposal is submitted for the quick procedure. Please mention the study on which the proposal is based on, and provide the list of changes from the original study.
The ECS will decide whether the research proposal qualifies for the quick procedure.
Procedure for the review of Testdays study proposals
The Testdays are data collection sessions during which first and second year sociology bachelor students join as participants in (pilot) studies conducted by department members. For studies taking part in the Testdays, ethical review by the ECS is compulsory.
Testdays sessions take place twice a year (once in spring and once in fall). In March and September, in occasion of the respective Testdays sessions, the ECS gathers to discuss the research proposals submitted for participation in the Testdays sessions. The proposals are evaluated based on the guidelines listed further below.
Instructions on how to submit a study proposal for a Testday session is sent to every department member some months before the actual sessions. For further information about the Testdays, please contact the Testdays coordinator Robert Krause ( email@example.com ) .
The evaluation by the ECS is guided by the following general codes of ethics:
- Code of Ethics for Research in the Social and Behavioural Sciences Involving Human Participants (Dutch)
- Code of Ethics for Research in the Social and Behavioural Sciences Involving Human Participants (English)
- VSNU Code of conduct for scientific practice (Dutch)
- VSNU Code of conduct fot scientific practice (English)
- ESF European Code of conduct for research integrity
- VSNU Code for use of personal data in scientific research (Dutch)
- VSNU Code for use of personal data in scientific research - bijlage (Dutch)
- American Sociological Association Code of Ethics
- "De AVG en de RUG"
For additional information and for the request of ethical review by the ECS, as well as for the submission of the study proposal to be reviewed, please write to firstname.lastname@example.org .
For study proposals related to the Testdays, please contact the Testdays coordinator, Robert Krause ( email@example.com ) .
|Last modified:||11 April 2019 10.05 a.m.|