Modernity as Dominance
Faculteit | Wijsbegeerte |
Jaar | 2021/22 |
Vakcode | FI164MD |
Vaknaam | Modernity as Dominance |
Niveau(s) | master |
Voertaal | Engels |
Periode | semester I b |
ECTS | 5 |
Rooster | rooster.rug.nl |
Uitgebreide vaknaam | Modernity as Dominance: Adorno and Foucault | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leerdoelen |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omschrijving | Theodor Adorno and Michel Foucault both developed, in their distinct ways, radical critiques of modernity – as a regime of disciplining power rather than emancipation, upsetting the received optimist angles to modernity. Adorno’s central concept was ‘instrumental reason’, Foucault employed concepts such as ‘discipline’ and ‘governmentality’. Both theoretical stances generated a host of commentaries, separately and in comparison. These hold different views of the relation between Adorno’s Critical Theoretical and Foucault’s poststructuralist forms of critique. We will study parts from these two philosophers’ own works, as well as a selection from the secondary literature, with authors such as Axel Honneth, Seyla Benhabib, Paul Rabinow, Thomas Lemke, Lois McNay and others. The two approaches clearly concur in certain respects, but what motives and premisses do they actually share, and where do they part company? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Uren per week | variabel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Onderwijsvorm |
groepsdiscussie
(Discussion seminar; reports of readings) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toetsvorm |
essay, schriftelijke opdracht(en)
(In-between written assignments and final essay) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vaksoort | master | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coördinator | dr. J.A. Vega | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docent(en) | dr. J.A. Vega | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verplichte literatuur |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entreevoorwaarden | Preferably several third year courses in social and political philosophy. When no such previous knowledge, consult the lecturer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opmerkingen | This course will consist of active student engagement and discussions rather than lectures. Students are expected to prepare the texts well, actively contribute to the sessions, and feel co-responsible for the intellectual process that a master course is. Your obligations further include a number of written preparations; mine consist in providing you with steady feedback, and theoretical context where necessary. You will thus be able to trace your own progress as to intellectual insight and philosophical writing skills throughout the course. The course adopts a no-screens policy: no digital devices are allowed in class. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opgenomen in |
|