Article by Michael Maes, Andreas Flache, Károly Takács and Karen A. Jehn wins Anatol-Rapoport-award
11 October 2012
The section "Model Building and Simulation" of the German Sociological Association has given this year's Anatol-Rapoport-award for an outstanding scientific publication of a German scientist to Michael Maes, Andreas Flache, Károly Takács and Karen A. Jehn for their paper "In the short term we divide, in the long term we unite: Demographic crisscrossing and the effects of faultlines on subgroup polarization". This paper is forthcoming in Organization Science. Michael Maes has been an ICS PhD student and postdoc at our department until 2011 where he took his PhD in 2010.
The paper formalizes the theory of demographic faultlines proposed by Lau and Murnighan in terms of a computational model. It moves beyond the original theory by showing how actors in bridge positions between demographic subgroups can help to overcome in the long run polarization in a team that initially arises due to strong demographic faultlines. The authors furthermore derive propositions about how group composition and individual decision mechanisms affect the efficiency and duration of the process of consensus formation. The jury states in its report that the paper "impresses with its formal elegance and proves once more how useful formal modelling and computer simulation can be to address research problems in the social sciences." (translated).
The award is shared with Clemens Kroneberg and Andreas Wimmer for their paper "Struggling over the boundaries of belonging. A formal model of nation building, ethnic closure, and populism", published in 2012 in the American Journal of Sociology (118/1:176-230).
The paper formalizes the theory of demographic faultlines proposed by Lau and Murnighan in terms of a computational model. It moves beyond the original theory by showing how actors in bridge positions between demographic subgroups can help to overcome in the long run polarization in a team that initially arises due to strong demographic faultlines. The authors furthermore derive propositions about how group composition and individual decision mechanisms affect the efficiency and duration of the process of consensus formation. The jury states in its report that the paper "impresses with its formal elegance and proves once more how useful formal modelling and computer simulation can be to address research problems in the social sciences." (translated).
The award is shared with Clemens Kroneberg and Andreas Wimmer for their paper "Struggling over the boundaries of belonging. A formal model of nation building, ethnic closure, and populism", published in 2012 in the American Journal of Sociology (118/1:176-230).
Last modified: | 07 August 2020 11.09 a.m. |
More news
-
09 April 2024
Kirsten van den Bosch: 'Connecting students with the work field really is achievable in every programme'
Dr Kirsten van den Bosch en her team won the Best Practice Award 2024 with their initiative to connect students with organizations to solve real problems within Academic Learning Communities.
-
03 April 2024
Research: much stress among Groningers due to gas extraction issues, including among the elderly
The gas extraction issue still has its effect on people in Groningen. Questionnaire research shows that people who had multiple instances of damage to their homes have increasingly poor health. In addition, interviews with elderly people show a...
-
05 March 2024
'Ordinary Joes can also be creative'
Organizational psychologist Eric Rietzschel researches creativity in the workplace. According to him, creativity enables us to move forward, but there is also a downside.