Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About usNews and EventsNews articles

Prof. J.G. Brouwer: ‘Football act is not strict enough and will not curb violence’

20 April 2010

The problems surrounding the cup final seem to imply that the government has too few legal means to tackle hooliganism. However, Professor J.G. Brouwer of General Law Studies expects the ‘football act’ currently in preparation to do little or nothing to change this situation. Will all matches soon have to be played without any away supporters?

After a great deal of humming and hawing, the decision has at last been made – Feijenoord and Ajax are not going to play one cup final but two, each only with home supporters. This is because the KNVB cannot do without a cup winner, the supporters can’t do without football and the government does not want to pay for the costs of a single match. ‘An understandable solution’, is the conclusion of public order law expert Prof. J.G. Brouwer. ‘A match in Rotterdam with Ajax supporters there too would need an army of police and riot police. The costs simply cannot be justified.’

No far-reaching changes

The problems surrounding the cup final seem to imply that the government has too few legal means to tackle hooliganism. The so-called ‘football act’ is currently being discussed in the Upper House of Parliament. However, the professor of General Law Studies does not expect it to be able to curb hooliganism. ‘They haven’t dared to introduce any radical changes to the law, as they did in England. There they have introduced ten principled changes to the law and the atmosphere around football matches has improved significantly. The crucial point is that English legislation dictates when the civil or criminal court must impose a stadium ban; if a judge does not, then he or she has to give good reasons for that decision.’

Missed chance

The suggested Dutch legislation provides two new opportunities for the mayor – a stadium ban and an obligation to report. However, clubs can already impose a sort of stadium ban on a supporter, so not much is going to change there. What is new is that the stadium ban will be able to be imposed more effectively. Supporters with a duty to report must report to police at the moment that their club is playing. Brouwer: ‘Mayors, however, are only responsible for public order in their own municipality. They can thus only impose a ban on a stadium in their own municipality. A mayor cannot issue a national ban, let alone an international stadium ban as an English judge can. I think that’s a missed chance.’

Head-on approach helps

‘It may sound a bit reactionary’, according to Brouwer, ‘but tackling hooliganism head on actually works. In England hooliganism earns a stadium ban of up to ten years, here it's only one year. That’s not going to frighten off hooligans.’ The professor also knows that in England the definition of sanctionable behaviour is much wider. ‘Criminal acts committed 24 hours before and after a match are also regarded as football related. It even counts in England if you are known to the police outside a football stadium – the judge is obliged to examine at least ten years of someone’s past.’

No more away supporters

Brouwer sees more chances for a creative solution for football violence in preventive incremental penalty payments. Brouwer: ‘The main ringleaders, i.e. those whom you almost know without a shadow of a doubt are going to use violence, could be sent a letter before a match with the warning: if you cause trouble, you’ll be fined five thousand euros per offence.’ According to the professor, the most effective method would be a general ban on visiting away matches. Brouwer: ‘If you then put a few huge television screens in the stadium of the away club, the supporters can still watch the match live together. You’d only need to charge a few euros admission to cover the costs of the screens.’

Curriculum vitae

Jan Brouwer (Oosterbeek, 1951) is professor of General Law Studies at the Faculty of Law of the University of Groningen. His research concentrates in particular on public order issues. Brouwer is a member of the objection committees of the ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS), deputy judge at the court in Assen and Honorary French Consul in Groningen.

Note for the press

More information: Jan Brouwer

Last modified:15 September 2017 3.10 p.m.
printView this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 19 November 2019

    Oldest evidence of salt production in Bronze Age Italy found along Tyrrhenian coast

    A new study by archaeologists of the University of Groningen in collaboration with the University of Rome Tor Vergata,reveals that a series of Bronze and Iron age archaeological sites located on the Tyrrhenian coast of Italy must be interpreted in the...

  • 15 November 2019

    Retirement Jan de Jeu: Board member from outside

    On Friday 15 November 2019, Jan de Jeu will retire from his position in the Board of the University of Groningen after eight years in office. When Jan de Jeu was appointed, it was the first time that the UG broke the tradition of only recruiting board...

  • 15 November 2019

    Hong Kong update: safety first

    We are very concerned regarding the current situation in Hong Kong, especially near some of the premises of our partner universities. The University of Hong Kong, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University have informed us...