A History of Neuroethics: The Examples of Neurolaw and Neuroenhancement and Their Social and Psychological Significance

What do new discoveries in the neuroscience mean for society, the social sciences, and psychology?

Researchers and partners

Behavioural and Social Sciences, Psychology

• dr. S. (Stephan) Schleim, Theory and History of Psychology

Education

Courses connected to this project

• Theory of Science
• Philosophy of Psychology

Results

Publications

• Schleim, S. & Quednow, B. (forthcoming 2017). Debunking the Enhancement Debate. In: R. Ter Meulen, W. Hall & A. D. Mohamed (eds.), Rethinking Cognitive Enhancement. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Schleim, S. (2014). Critical Neuroscience – or Critical Science? A Perspective on the Perceived Normative Significance of Neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Research Topic: Critical Neuroscience), 8, 336.
• Schleim, S. (2014). Whose well-being? Common conceptions and misconceptions in the enhancement debate (Opinion Article). Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 148.
• Schleim, S. (2012). Brains in Context in the Neurolaw Debate: The Examples of Free Will and “Dangerous” Brains. International Journal for Law and Psychiatry, 35, 104-111.

Successful grant proposals and other achievements

• NWO "A History of Neuroethics: The Examples of Neurolaw and Neuroenhancement and Their Social and Psychological Significance" (2017-2020)

More information

• forthcoming