Never waste a good crisis, is sometimes said. But after the fall of Lehman Brothers and the great recession that followed, leaders have hardly changed, according to research by Professor of Leadership Janka Stoker and Professor of Economics Harry Garretsen.
The 2008 financial crisis started ten years ago. The fall of Lehman Brothers on 15 September 2008 impacted on the entire global business world, and was the trigger for the so-called Great Recession. Economists have been racking their brains about the causes and effects of this crisis, resulting in several important books like This time is different by Reinhart and Rogoff (2009) and more recently Crashed by Tooze (2018). All of them give their own analysis of the causes and consequences of the financial crisis and provide a largely macro-perspective.
However, we still know very little about the impact that the financial crisis had within organizations. How does a shock like this affect organizations and their leaders? Very little information on this subject is available in the literature about leadership. This is because, to answer the question, international and comparable data about leadership behavior are needed. And as you can probably imagine, information like this is hard to come by.
Nevertheless, the consultancy firm Korn Ferry Hay Group gave us access to unique data on over 20,000 managers in 980 organizations across 36 countries. Employees working for these managers answered all kinds of questions about their bosses, providing information relating to both before and after the 2008 crisis. This information enabled us to ascertain whether the financial crisis led to changes in leadership behavior.
The results show that changes in behavior certainly did take place when one compares the years just before and after the 2008 crisis (Stoker, Garretsen & Soudis, 2018):
These results teach us about the crisis reflex of managers. Regardless of whether an organization does or does not benefit from a more directive style of leadership, the temporary nature of the change is particularly striking. Some two years later, managers no longer showed any signs of having been through a crisis. In fact, in the financial sector, the crisis had no significant effect on leadership behavior whatsoever. It seems that organizations failed to take advantage of this golden opportunity to think more fundamentally about the necessary changes within their organizations and in the behavior of their managers, while it is known that change always starts with the behaviors of leaders (Stoker, 2005).
The old adage ‘never waste a good crisis’ doesn’t seem to apply to the 2008 crisis. At most, this crisis caused a ripple of different leadership behavior. Thus ten years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers and despite all the fine words and even such measures as the Bankers’ Oath, very little seems to have changed. If an unprecedented shock like the 2008 crisis isn’t enough to cause fundamental change, we can only hope (and probably in vain) that change will start from within.
Prof. Janka Stoker, Professor of Leadership and Organizational Change, and Prof. Harry Garretsen, Professor of International Economics and Business, both head of the In the LEAD centre of expertise on the effectiveness of leadership at the University of Groningen.
> More news from the Faculty of Economics and Business
> FEB experts in the media
Machiel Mulder, Daan Hulshof, Peter Perey en Lennard Rekker van het Centre for Energy Economics Research (CEER) van de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen hebben het effect van minder olie- en gaswinning onderzocht op het wereldwijde verbruik.
Across the globe, one third of all food produced for human consumption ends up in the waste bin. Most of this waste gets thrown away by consumers. Marit Luiting-Drijfhout conducted research into our behaviour when buying, consuming and wasting food...
How do marketers make the most out of data without breaking privacy rules? Jaap Wieringa and his team give answer to this question by developing new marketing models that prove: targeted marketing is possible, even in the face of privacy concerns.