Page content
Section menu
Main menu
Associative links
Page content:
English

Evaluation reports



Self evaluation 2003 - 2008
 

Self evaluation 2003-2008
Self evaluation 2003-2008

In this report we describe the research conducted by the SHARE between 2003 and 2008. In the report, you will find the institute's mission, a description of the research programs, an overview of input in terms of research time and money, an overview of scientific output in different forms, an analysis of the institute's impact both in and outside scientific circles and, finally, its plans for the future.

 

Click below to download the chapters of the self evaluation report 'Taking SHARE's measure':

Chapter 1 [PDF] SHARE at institutional level
Chapter 2 [PDF] Research Master and PhD training program
Chapter 3 [PDF] HPR
Chapter 4 [PDF] PHR
Chapter 5 [PDF] EBM
Chapter 6 [PDF] RPR
Chapter 7 [PDF] ICPE
Chapter 8 [PDF] Upcoming groups 

 

 

Assessment by the Peer Review Committee [PDF]

  

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Self evaluation 1997-2002
Self evaluation 1997-2002

Self evaluation 1997 - 2002

In this report we describe the research conducted by the NCH between 1997 and 2002. In the report, you will find the institute's mission, a description of the research programs, an overview of input in terms of research time and money, an overview of scientific output in different forms, an analysis of the institute's impact both in and outside scientific circles and, finally, its plans for the future.

 

Click below to download the chapters of Quality of life and evaluation of healthcare:

Report Peer Review Committee
Report Peer Review Committee

Report Peer Review Committee

In 2003, the Dutch system for assessing the quality of research underwent a major change. The system of national, external assessments of individual disciplines, co-ordinated by the office of the Association of Dutch Universities (VSNU), was discontinued. In its place, the Executive Boards of the universities now determine the design and organisation of the research quality evaluations. They are bound by the “Standard Evaluation Protocol 2003-2009”(SEP), which is approved not only by VSNU but also by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and the Dutch ministry of education and science.

 

The SEP requires the committee members to evaluate the research institute or school as a whole and the relevant parts of the institute (research programs) individually, on four main aspects, namely:

  • Quality (international recognition and innovative potential)
  • Productivity (scientific output)
  • Relevance (scientific and socio-economic impact)
  • Vitality and feasibility (flexibility, management, and leadership)

Click here [PDF] to download the assessment of research quality of the NCH.  

Last modified:October 07, 2010 17:26
Associative links:
 
Current section:

About us

Home RUG   SHARE   About us